Cost optimisation and minimisation of the environmental impact through life cycle analysis of the waste water treatment plant of Bree (Belgium)

被引:11
作者
De Gussem, K. [1 ]
Wambecq, T. [1 ]
Roels, J. [1 ]
Fenu, A. [1 ]
De Gueldre, G. [1 ]
Van De Steene, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aquafin, Dept Res & Dev, B-2630 Aartselaar, Belgium
关键词
activated sludge model; full-scale; LCA; WWTP optimisation; energy saving; impact reduction; NITROGEN REMOVAL; SLUDGE; MODEL; BENCHMARKING; CALIBRATION; PHOSPHORUS; WWTP;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2011.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An ASM2da model of the full-scale waste water plant of Bree (Belgium) has been made. It showed very good correlation with reference operational data. This basic model has been extended to include an accurate calculation of environmental footprint and operational costs (energy consumption, dosing of chemicals and sludge treatment). Two optimisation strategies were compared: lowest cost meeting the effluent consent versus lowest environmental footprint. Six optimisation scenarios have been studied, namely (i) implementation of an online control system based on ammonium and nitrate sensors, (ii) implementation of a control on MLSS concentration, (iii) evaluation of internal recirculation flow, (iv) oxygen set point, (v) installation of mixing in the aeration tank, and (vi) evaluation of nitrate setpoint for post denitrification. Both an environmental impact or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based approach for optimisation are able to significantly lower the cost and environmental footprint. However, the LCA approach has some advantages over cost minimisation of an existing full-scale plant. LCA tends to chose control settings that are more logic: it results in a safer operation of the plant with less risks regarding the consents. It results in a better effluent at a slightly increased cost.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 170
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, The Kyoto Protocol
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste Water
  • [3] Benchmarking of WWTP design by assessing costs, effluent quality and process variability
    Benedetti, L.
    Bixio, D.
    Vanrolleghem, P. A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (10) : 95 - 102
  • [4] DAIGGER GT, 1985, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V57, P859
  • [5] Estimating costs and benefits of advanced control for wastewater treatment plants - the MAgIC methodology
    Devisscher, M.
    Ciacci, G.
    Fe, L.
    Benedetti, L.
    Bixio, D.
    Thoeye, C.
    De Gueldre, G.
    Marsili-Libelli, S.
    Vanrolleghem, P. A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (4-5) : 215 - 223
  • [6] DOKA G, 2007, 13 EC CTR
  • [7] Evolutionary parameter optimization of a fuzzy controller which is used to control a sewage treatment plant
    Ebner, Marc
    Stalph, Patrick
    Michel, Martin
    Benz, Roland
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (01) : 53 - 66
  • [8] Full activated sludge model no. 1 calibration experience at a medium-size WWTP in Mexico
    Fall, C.
    Loaiza-Navia, J.
    Esparza-Soto, M.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (12) : 3069 - 3082
  • [9] Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems
    Foley, Jeffrey
    de Haas, David
    Hartley, Ken
    Lant, Paul
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (05) : 1654 - 1666
  • [10] Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art
    Gernaey, KV
    van Loosdrecht, MCM
    Henze, M
    Lind, M
    Jorgensen, SB
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (09) : 763 - 783