Design and environmental sustainability assessment of small-scale off-grid energy systems for remote rural communities

被引:122
作者
Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro [1 ,3 ]
Stamford, Laurence [1 ]
Azapagic, Adisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sustainable Ind Syst, Dept Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Philippines, Dept Chem Engn, CP Garcia Ave, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[3] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Hybrid energy systems; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Microgeneration; Off-grid energy; Rural electrification; Renewable energy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRIFICATION; ELECTRICITY; BATTERIES; POWER; CLASSIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114004
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Small-scale off-grid renewable energy systems are being increasingly used for rural electrification, commonly as stand-alone home systems or community micro-grids. With the variety of technologies and configurations available, it is not clear which options are sustainable for remote communities. This study investigates the life cycle environmental sustainability of both home and community installations, designed as part of this work, which utilise diesel, solar, and wind resources coupled with battery storage. A total of 21 system configurations (six home systems and 15 micro-grids) have been designed and optimised for a prototypical rural community in the Philippines, considering both stand-alone and hybrid systems. Life cycle assessment (LCA) considering 18 potential impact categories has been carried out to compare the environmental impacts associated with electricity production of each option. At the household level, hybrid solar photovoltaics (PV)-wind systems with storage have 17-40% lower impacts than the equivalent stand-alone installations per kWh generated. Batteries are a major environmental hotspot, causing up to 88% of the life cycle impacts of a home energy system. Among the community micro-grid options, the PV-wind-lead acid battery hybrid system has the lowest impacts in many categories, including climate change, ozone depletion, and acidification. Comparing equivalent architectures for single-household and community-scale installations, PV systems are environmentally more sustainable if installed individually in households, while larger turbines in community micro-grids are environmentally better for wind utilisation. The results suggest that a household-scale PV system integrated within a micro-grid with community-scale wind turbines and Li-ion batteries is environmentally the most sustainable configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [51] Review of hybrid renewable energy systems with comparative analysis of off-grid hybrid system
    Sawle, Yashwant
    Gupta, S. C.
    Bohre, Aashish Kumar
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 : 2217 - 2235
  • [52] Life cycle assessment of power generation alternatives for a stand-alone mobile house
    Sevencan, Suat
    Ciftcioglu, Gokcen A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (34) : 14369 - 14379
  • [53] Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems
    Sinha, Sunanda
    Chandel, S. S.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 32 : 192 - 205
  • [54] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Thai Island's diesel/PV/wind hybrid microgrid
    Smith, Cameron
    Burrows, John
    Scheier, Eric
    Young, Amberli
    Smith, Jessica
    Young, Tiffany
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 80 : 85 - 100
  • [55] Life-cycle analysis of flow-assisted nickel zinc-, manganese dioxide-, and valve-regulated lead-acid batteries designed for demand-charge reduction
    Spanos, Constantine
    Turney, Damon E.
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 43 : 478 - 494
  • [56] Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations
    Turconi, Roberto
    Boldrin, Alessio
    Astrup, Thomas
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 28 : 555 - 565
  • [57] Environmental impacts of small-scale hybrid energy systems: Coupling solar photovoltaics and lithium-ion batteries
    Uctug, Fehmi Gorkem
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 643 : 1579 - 1589
  • [58] The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology
    Wernet, Gregor
    Bauer, Christian
    Steubing, Bernhard
    Reinhard, Jurgen
    Moreno-Ruiz, Emilia
    Weidema, Bo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) : 1218 - 1230
  • [59] World Bank, 2008, The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification: A Reassessment of the Costs and Benefits
  • [60] World Bank, 2007, Technical and Economic Assessment of Off-Grid, Mini-Grid, and Grid Electrification Technologies