Design and environmental sustainability assessment of small-scale off-grid energy systems for remote rural communities

被引:122
作者
Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro [1 ,3 ]
Stamford, Laurence [1 ]
Azapagic, Adisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sustainable Ind Syst, Dept Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Philippines, Dept Chem Engn, CP Garcia Ave, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[3] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Hybrid energy systems; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Microgeneration; Off-grid energy; Rural electrification; Renewable energy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRIFICATION; ELECTRICITY; BATTERIES; POWER; CLASSIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114004
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Small-scale off-grid renewable energy systems are being increasingly used for rural electrification, commonly as stand-alone home systems or community micro-grids. With the variety of technologies and configurations available, it is not clear which options are sustainable for remote communities. This study investigates the life cycle environmental sustainability of both home and community installations, designed as part of this work, which utilise diesel, solar, and wind resources coupled with battery storage. A total of 21 system configurations (six home systems and 15 micro-grids) have been designed and optimised for a prototypical rural community in the Philippines, considering both stand-alone and hybrid systems. Life cycle assessment (LCA) considering 18 potential impact categories has been carried out to compare the environmental impacts associated with electricity production of each option. At the household level, hybrid solar photovoltaics (PV)-wind systems with storage have 17-40% lower impacts than the equivalent stand-alone installations per kWh generated. Batteries are a major environmental hotspot, causing up to 88% of the life cycle impacts of a home energy system. Among the community micro-grid options, the PV-wind-lead acid battery hybrid system has the lowest impacts in many categories, including climate change, ozone depletion, and acidification. Comparing equivalent architectures for single-household and community-scale installations, PV systems are environmentally more sustainable if installed individually in households, while larger turbines in community micro-grids are environmentally better for wind utilisation. The results suggest that a household-scale PV system integrated within a micro-grid with community-scale wind turbines and Li-ion batteries is environmentally the most sustainable configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment and feasibility study of small wind power in Thailand
    Glassbrook, Keith A.
    Carr, Adam H.
    Drosnes, Mark L.
    Oakley, T. Reade
    Kamens, Richard M.
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 22 : 66 - 73
  • [32] Dynamic Analysis of Global Copper Flows. Global Stocks, Postconsumer Material Flows, Recycling Indicators, and Uncertainty Evaluation
    Gloeser, Simon
    Soulier, Marcel
    Espinoza, Luis A. Tercero
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (12) : 6564 - 6572
  • [33] Goedkoop M., 2013, ReCiPe 2008 version 1.08
  • [34] Environmental impacts of micro-wind turbines and their potential to contribute to UK climate change targets
    Greening, Benjamin
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. ENERGY, 2013, 59 : 454 - 466
  • [35] Guo M., 2012, LCA Case Studies of Starch-Based Foam. Life Cycle Assess. Light. Eco-composites, P153, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-35037-5_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35037-5_4]
  • [36] International Energy Agency International Renewable Energy Agency United Nations World Bank Group and World Health Organization, 2018, TRACK SDG7 EN PROGR
  • [37] ISO, 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment
  • [38] Principles and framework
  • [39] Jungbluth N., 2012, Life Cycle Inventories of Photovoltaics
  • [40] Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8 kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system
    Kabakian, V.
    McManus, M. C.
    Harajli, H.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 154 : 428 - 437