Alternatives to culling male chicks - the consumer perspective

被引:13
作者
Reithmayer, Corrina [1 ]
Musshoff, Oliver [1 ]
Danne, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Fak Agr Wissensch, Gottingen, Germany
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2019年 / 122卷 / 03期
关键词
Choice experiment; Label; Egg; Chick culling; Dual-use poultry; In ovo; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PREFERENCES; BEEF; CERTIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; VALUATION; MARKET; MODEL; LOGIT;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-05-2019-0356
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate consumer preferences for boxes of eggs which are produced without the culling of male layer-type chicks in layer hen production and, furthermore, to investigate consumer preferences for labels from different certifying bodies. Design/methodology/approach An online survey including a discrete choice experiment was conducted among 526 German consumers in 2018 and early 2019. Mixed logit models in preference and willingness to pay (WTP) space were estimated. Findings The preferred alternative is gender determination of incubated eggs, but also dual-use (DU) poultry with free-range rearing of cockerels was approved. Labels from public authorities and the Animal Protection Organisation were highly approved. In contrast, retailers were not considered suitable for the certification of production claims. Originality/value This is the first study focussing on preferences and WTP for alternatives to chick culling, which will soon be available on the market, and for institutions certifying production claims. Findings help political decision makers, when looking for alternatives to the culling of day-old chicks, which are considered more acceptable by the public.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 765
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Lohmann Inf
[2]   Model selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation [J].
Balcombe, Kelvin ;
Chalak, Ali ;
Fraser, Iain .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 57 (02) :226-237
[3]  
Bio Austria, 2016, BUND JUR 2016 GEHT B
[4]  
*BMEL, 2017, ALT ZUM TOT MANNL KU
[5]   Moral "Lock-In" in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives [J].
Bruijnis, M. R. N. ;
Blok, V. ;
Stassen, E. N. ;
Gremmen, H. G. J. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2015, 28 (05) :939-960
[6]  
Brummer N., 2018, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V9, P390
[7]   Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Martinsson, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 41 (02) :179-192
[8]  
Diekmann J., 2017, Berichte uber Landwirtschaft, V95, P1
[9]  
EC (European Commission), 2008, Off. J.Europ. Comm, V157, P46
[10]  
*EUR COMM, 2008, QUEST ANSW PROP PROT