Science's reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune

被引:100
|
作者
Aguinis, Herman [1 ]
Cascio, Wayne F. [2 ]
Ramani, Ravi S. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Management, Sch Business, 2201 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Denver, Business Sch, 1475 Lawrence St, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
capitalization on chance; quantitative methods; reproducibility; replicability; credibility; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES; BEST-PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS; STATISTICAL CONTROL; ORGANIZATIONAL-RESEARCH; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; BIG DATA; EDITORS; PSYCHOLOGY; METAANALYSIS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1057/s41267-017-0081-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
International business is not immune to science's reproducibility and replicability crisis. We argue that this crisis is not entirely surprising given the methodological practices that enhance systematic capitalization on chance. This occurs when researchers search for a maximally predictive statistical model based on a particular dataset and engage in several trial-and-error steps that are rarely disclosed in published articles. We describe systematic capitalization on chance, distinguish it from unsystematic capitalization on chance, address five common practices that capitalize on chance, and offer actionable strategies to minimize the capitalization on chance and improve the reproducibility and replicability of future IB research.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 663
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune
    Herman Aguinis
    Wayne F. Cascio
    Ravi S. Ramani
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48 : 653 - 663
  • [2] Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
    Nosek, Brian A.
    Hardwicke, Tom E.
    Moshontz, Hannah
    Allard, Aurelien
    Corker, Katherine S.
    Dreber, Anna
    Fidler, Fiona
    Hilgard, Joe
    Struhl, Melissa Kline
    Nuijten, Michele B.
    Rohrer, Julia M.
    Romero, Felipe
    Scheel, Anne M.
    Scherer, Laura D.
    Schoenbrodt, Felix D.
    Vazire, Simine
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 73 : 719 - 748
  • [3] Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science
    Brodeur, Abel
    Esterling, Kevin
    Ankel-Peters, Joerg
    Bueno, Natalia S.
    Desposato, Scott
    Dreber, Anna
    Genovese, Federica
    Green, Donald P.
    Hepplewhite, Matthew
    de la Guardia, Fernando Hoces
    Johannesson, Magnus
    Kotsadam, Andreas
    Miguel, Edward
    Velez, Yamil R.
    Young, Lauren
    RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [4] Psychological Science's Replicability Crisis and What It Means for Science in the Courtroom
    Chin, Jason M.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2014, 20 (03) : 225 - 238
  • [5] Reproducibility and replicability of science and thoracic surgery
    Lawton, Jennifer S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 152 (06) : 1489 - 1491
  • [6] Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis
    Romero, Felipe
    PHILOSOPHY COMPASS, 2019, 14 (11)
  • [7] Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics-A systematic review of literature
    Hensel, Przemyslaw G.
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 39 (05) : 577 - 594
  • [8] A Model-Driven Approach for Systematic Reproducibility and Replicability of Data Science Projects
    Melchor, Fran
    Rodriguez-Echeverria, Roberto
    Conejero, Jose M.
    Prieto, Alvaro E.
    Gutierrez, Juan D.
    ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (CAISE 2022), 2022, : 147 - 163
  • [10] THE RESEARCH REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS AND ECONOMICS OF SCIENCE
    Maniadis, Zacharias
    Tufano, Fabio
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2017, 127 (605) : F200 - F208