Balloon Dilatation and Stenting for Aortic Coarctation A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:36
|
作者
Salcher, Maximilian [1 ]
Naci, Huseyin [1 ]
Law, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Kuehne, Titus [3 ]
Schubert, Stephan [3 ]
Kelm, Marcus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Hlth, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Paediat Cardiol & Congenital Heart Dis, Berlin, Germany
关键词
aneurysm; angioplasty; balloon; congenital; meta-analysis; stent; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; NATIVE COARCTATION; RECURRENT COARCTATION; ANGIOPLASTY TREATMENT; ADULT; ADOLESCENTS; REPAIR; INCONSISTENCY; COMPLICATIONS; INTERMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003153
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There is no systematic assessment of available evidence on effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of balloon dilatation and stenting for aortic coarctation. Methods and Results-We systematically searched 4 online databases to identify and select relevant studies of balloon dilatation and stenting for aortic coarctation based on a priori criteria (PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014418). We quantitatively synthesized results for each intervention from single-arm studies and obtained pooled estimates for relative effectiveness from pairwise and network meta-analysis of comparative studies. Our primary analysis included 15 stenting (423 participants) and 12 balloon dilatation studies (361 participants), including patients >= 10 years of age. Post-treatment blood pressure gradient reduction to <= 20 and <= 10 mm Hg was achieved in 89.5% (95% confidence interval, 83.7-95.3) and 66.5% (44.1-88.9%) of patients undergoing balloon dilatation, and in 99.5% (97.5-100.0%) and 93.8% (88.5-99.1%) of patients undergoing stenting, respectively. Odds of achieving <= 20 mm Hg were lower with balloon dilatation as compared with stenting (odds ratio, 0.105 [0.010-0.886]). Thirty-day survival rates were comparable. Numerically more patients undergoing balloon dilatation experienced severe complications during admission (6.4% [2.6-10.2%]) compared with stenting (2.6% [0.5-4.7%]). This was supported by meta-analysis of head-to-head studies (odds ratio, 9.617 [2.654-34.845]) and network meta-analysis (odds ratio, 16.23, 95% credible interval: 4.27-62.77) in a secondary analysis in patients >= 1 month of age, including 57 stenting (3397 participants) and 62 balloon dilatation studies (4331 participants). Conclusions-Despite the limitations of the evidence base consisting predominantly of single-arm studies, our review indicates that stenting achieves superior immediate relief of a relevant pressure gradient compared with balloon dilatation.
引用
收藏
页数:89
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Are aortic biomechanical properties early markers of dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rosnel, Claire
    Sivera, Raphael
    Cervi, Elena
    Danton, Mark
    Schievano, Silvia
    Capelli, Claudio
    Aggarwal, Ankush
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2024, 23 (06) : 2043 - 2061
  • [32] The efficacy and safety of catheter balloon dilatation in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Lin
    Yao, Jian
    Guan, Bugao
    Xu, Jin
    Yu, Haitao
    Li, Hongbo
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (44) : E31460
  • [33] BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY OF AORTIC COARCTATION - A REVIEW
    RAO, PS
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 12 (11) : 618 - 628
  • [34] Aortic Stenosis Progression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Willner, Nadav
    Prosperi-Porta, Graeme
    Lau, Lawrence
    Fu, Angel Yi Nam
    Boczar, Kevin
    Poulin, Anthony
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Unni, Rudy R.
    Visintini, Sarah
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Chan, Kwan-Leung
    Beauchesne, Luc
    Burwash, Ian G.
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 16 (03) : 314 - 328
  • [35] Laser balloon ablation for AF: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Reynolds, Matthew R.
    Zheng, Qi
    Doros, Gheorghe
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (10) : 1363 - 1370
  • [36] TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION WITH OR WITHOUT PRE-IMPLANTATION BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Ludman, Peter
    de Belder, Mark
    Sponga, Sandro
    Gunning, Mark
    Nolan, James
    Kiaii, Bob
    Diamantouros, Pantelis
    Chu, Michael
    Teefy, Patrick
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 411 - 411
  • [37] Surgical Valvotomy Versus Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hill, Garick D.
    Ginde, Salil
    Rios, Rodrigo
    Frommelt, Peter C.
    Hill, Kevin D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (08):
  • [38] Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Outcomes and Safety of Transcaval Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Salihu, Adil
    Ferlay, Clemence
    Kirsch, Matthias
    Shah, Pinak B.
    Skali, Hicham
    Fournier, Stephane
    Muller, Olivier
    Hugelshofer, Sarah
    Skalidis, Ioannis
    Tzimas, Georgios
    Monney, Pierre
    Eeckhout, Eric
    Arangalage, Dimitri
    Rancati, Valentina
    Antiochos, Panagiotis
    Lu, Henri
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (11) : 2054 - 2062
  • [39] BILIARY DILATATION AMONGST NARCOTIC USERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Naga, Yassin
    Saghir, Syed Mohsin
    Schreiber, Ariyon
    Dhindsa, Banreet S.
    Daid, Sarav G.
    Ramai, Daryl
    Sayles, Harlan
    Mashiana, Harmeet S.
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    Rangray, Rajani
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S307 - S307
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Strictures: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
    Dahiya, Dushyant S.
    Jena, Anuraag
    Bapaye, Jay
    Mohan, Babu
    Kassab, Lena
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Kochhar, Gursimran S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S913 - S914