Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

被引:95
|
作者
Komori, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol Neuropathol, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 1830042, Japan
关键词
DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; BRAIN-TUMORS; IDH; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; ASTROCYTOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; 1P/19Q;
D O I
10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted new molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, i.e., the CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, as independent molecular markers of the highest grade. The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Histological and molecular glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype: a real-world landscape using the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Gu, Lingui
    Li, Yilin
    Zheng, Zhiyao
    Chen, Wenlin
    Wang, Yaning
    Wang, Yuekun
    Xing, Hao
    Shi, Yixin
    Liu, Delin
    Yang, Tianrui
    Xia, Yu
    Li, Junlin
    Wu, Jiaming
    Zhang, Kun
    Liang, Tingyu
    Wang, Hai
    Liu, Qianshu
    Jin, Shanmu
    Qu, Tian
    Guo, Siying
    Li, Huanzhang
    Wang, Yu
    Ma, Wenbin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [42] The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: What Neuroradiologists Need to Know
    Osborn, A. G.
    Louis, D. N.
    Poussaint, T. Y.
    Linscott, L. L.
    Salzman, K. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2022, : 928 - 937
  • [43] The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: What Neuroradiologists Need to Know
    Osborn, A. G.
    Louis, D. N.
    Poussaint, T. Y.
    Linscott, L. L.
    Salzman, K. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 45 (12) : S15 - S24
  • [44] Classification of adult diffuse gliomas by molecular markers-a short review with historical footnote
    Otani, Ryohei
    Uzuka, Takeo
    Ueki, Keisuke
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 47 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [45] Editorial: Impacts of 2021 WHO classification on the precise diagnosis and management of gliomas
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Wang, Yu
    Ma, Wenbin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [46] Major Features of the 2021 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors
    Smith, Heather L.
    Wadhwani, Nitin
    Horbinski, Craig
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 19 (06) : 1691 - 1704
  • [47] The WHO 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System tumours: a practical update on what neurosurgeons need to know—a minireview
    Sverre Helge Torp
    Ole Solheim
    Anne Jarstein Skjulsvik
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2022, 164 : 2453 - 2464
  • [48] Imaging-based stratification of adult gliomas prognosticates survival and correlates with the 2021 WHO classification
    Kamble, Akshaykumar N.
    Agrawal, Nidhi K.
    Koundal, Surabhi
    Bhargava, Salil
    Kamble, Abhaykumar N.
    Joyner, David A.
    Kalelioglu, Tuba
    Patel, Sohil H.
    Jain, Rajan
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 65 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [49] The 2007 WHO classification of Tumors of the Nervous System: Controversies in surgical neuropathology
    Scheithauer, Bernd W.
    Fuller, Greg N.
    VandenBerg, Scott R.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [50] Clinical impact of revisions to the WHO classification of diffuse gliomas and associated future problems
    Sonoda, Yukihiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (06) : 1004 - 1009