Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

被引:96
|
作者
Komori, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol Neuropathol, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 1830042, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; BRAIN-TUMORS; IDH; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; ASTROCYTOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; 1P/19Q;
D O I
10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted new molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, i.e., the CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, as independent molecular markers of the highest grade. The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system: a review for the neuroradiologist
    Cillian McNamara
    Kshitij Mankad
    Stefanie Thust
    Luke Dixon
    Clara Limback-Stanic
    Felice D’Arco
    Thomas S. Jacques
    Ulrike Löbel
    Neuroradiology, 2022, 64 : 1919 - 1950
  • [22] Classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas: Impact of the World Health Organization 2021 update
    Whitfield, Benjamin T.
    Huse, Jason T.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04)
  • [23] Development of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Historical Perspective
    Scheithauer, Bernd W.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 19 (04) : 551 - 564
  • [24] Clinical implications of the 2021 edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumours
    Horbinski, Craig
    Berger, Tamar
    Packer, Roger J.
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2022, 18 (09) : 515 - 529
  • [25] World Health Organization 2016 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors
    Diamandis, Phedias
    Aldape, Kenneth
    NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 2018, 36 (03) : 439 - +
  • [26] Utilizing the amide proton transfer technique to characterize diffuse gliomas based on the WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumors
    Filimonova, Elena
    Pashkov, Anton
    Borisov, Norayr
    Kalinovsky, Anton
    Rzaev, Jamil
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 37 (04) : 490 - 499
  • [27] Towards an integrated morphological and molecular WHO diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: a paradigm shift
    Rushing, Elisabeth J.
    Wesseling, Pieter
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2015, 28 (06) : 628 - 632
  • [28] ISNO consensus guidelines for practical adaptation of the WHO 2016 classification of adult diffuse gliomas
    Santosh, Vani
    Sravya, Palavalasa
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Muzumdar, Dattatraya
    Chacko, Geeta
    Suri, Vaishali
    Epari, Sridhar
    Balasubramaniam, Anandh
    Radotra, Bishan Dass
    Chatterjee, Sandip
    Sarkar, Chitra
    Jalali, Rakesh
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2019, 67 (01) : 173 - 182
  • [29] Neuro-radiological characteristics of adult diffuse grade II and III insular gliomas classified according to WHO 2016
    Compes, Paloma
    Tabouret, Emeline
    Etcheverry, Amandine
    Colin, Carole
    Appay, Romain
    Cordier, Nicolas
    Mosser, Jean
    Chinot, Olivier
    Delingette, Herve
    Girard, Nadine
    Dufour, Henry
    Metellus, Philippe
    Figarella-Branger, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 142 (03) : 511 - 520
  • [30] Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications of the 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system
    Gritsch, Simon
    Batchelor, Tracy T.
    Gonzalez Castro, L. Nicolas
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (01) : 47 - 58