Light intensity preferences of broiler chickens: implications for welfare

被引:24
|
作者
Raccoursier, M. [1 ]
Thaxton, Y., V [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, K. [1 ,3 ]
Aldridge, D. J. [1 ]
Scanes, C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Poultry Sci, 1260 W Maple,POSC0-114, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Ctr Food Anim Wellbeing, 1260 W Maple,POSC0-114, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Tyson Foods, Springdale, AR 72762 USA
关键词
Illumination; level; choice; meat fowl; LAYING HENS; LEG DISORDERS; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; PHOTOPERIOD;
D O I
10.1017/S175173111900123X
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
There is considerable debate as to the optimal light intensities for growing chickens. This is influencing regulations and industry practices. The present study examines the preference of broiler chickens for light intensity. A choice system was developed to allow determination of the preferences of broiler chickens for light intensity. This system had three light proof pens each with feeders or waterers but different light intensities. There was a connecting transit pen with a light intensity of 1 to 2 lux. This allowed birds access to the pens each with feeders or waterers. There were markedly more chickens observed in the pens each with feeders or waterers and a light intensity of 20 lux than 5 lux. Moreover, more feed was consumed in the 20 lux pens than 5 pens. There were also high numbers of chickens in the transit compartment with its low light intensity (1 to 2 lux) and no feeders or waterers. Broiler chickens exhibited a preference for 20 lux light intensity for feeding compared to 5 lux light intensity. The present study supports the view that there should be a light intensity of at least 20 lux for the areas around the feeders and also suggests that light intensity may be reduced in other areas for resting and other activities.
引用
收藏
页码:2857 / 2863
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Welfare implications of nipple drinkers for broiler chickens
    Houldcroft, E.
    Smith, C.
    Mrowicki, R.
    Headland, L.
    Grieveson, S.
    Jones, T. A.
    Dawkins, M. S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2008, 17 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] Light quality preferences of broiler chickens.
    Kristensen, HH
    Prescott, NB
    Ladewig, J
    Perry, G
    Johnsen, PF
    Wathes, CM
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (05) : S11 - S12
  • [3] Effects of a variable light intensity lighting program on the welfare and performance of commercial broiler chickens
    Kang, Seong W.
    Christensen, Karen D.
    Kidd Jr, Michael T.
    Orlowski, Sara K.
    Clark, James
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [4] Light intensity preferences of broiler chickens is affected by breed, age, time of day and behaviour
    van der Eijk, Jerine A. J.
    Garcia-Faria, Tomas Izquierdo
    Melis, Stephanie
    van Riel, Johan W.
    te Beest, Dennis E.
    de Jong, Ingrid C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [5] The effect of light intensity on broiler behavior and welfare
    Blatchford, R. A.
    Mench, J. A.
    Wakenell, P. S.
    Archer, G. S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 : 126 - 126
  • [6] The effect of light intensity on broiler behavior and welfare
    Blatchford, R. A.
    Mench, J. A.
    Wakenell, P. S.
    Archer, G. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 126 - 126
  • [7] The effect of light intensity on broiler behavior and welfare
    Blatchford, R. A.
    Mench, J. A.
    Wakenell, P. S.
    Archer, G. S.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 : 126 - 126
  • [8] Welfare of broiler chickens
    Meluzzi, Adele
    Sirri, Federico
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 8 : 161 - 173
  • [9] Evaluation of Light Color Manipulation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens
    Oke, Oyegunle Emmanuel
    Oso, Oluwadamilola
    Iyasere, Oluwaseun
    Oni, Aderanti
    Bakre, Oluwatobiloba
    Rahman, Samson
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2023, 26 (04) : 493 - 504
  • [10] Impact of light intensity on broiler biological rhythms and welfare
    Deep, A.
    Schwean-Lardner, K.
    Crowe, T. G.
    Fancher, B. I.
    Classen, H. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 522 - 522