Influence of Audibility and Distortion on Recognition of Reverberant Speech for Children and Adults with Hearing Aid Amplification

被引:2
|
作者
Brennan, Marc A. [1 ]
McCreery, Ryan W. [2 ]
Massey, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Special Educ & Commun Disorders, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, Ctr Hearing Res, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Silverstein Inst, Florida Ear & Sinus Ctr, Sarasota, FL USA
关键词
hearing loss; hearing aids; speech perception; adults and children; DYNAMIC-RANGE COMPRESSION; FAST-ACTING COMPRESSION; RELEASE TIME; MULTICHANNEL COMPRESSION; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; CONSONANT RECOGNITION; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERCEPTION; NOISE; LISTENERS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1678-3381
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background Adults and children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) have trouble understanding speech in rooms with reverberation when using hearing aid amplification. While the use of amplitude compression signal processing in hearing aids may contribute to this difficulty, there is conflicting evidence on the effects of amplitude compression settings on speech recognition. Less clear is the effect of a fast release time for adults and children with SNHL when using compression ratios derived from a prescriptive procedure. Purpose The aim of the study is to determine whether release time impacts speech recognition in reverberation for children and adults with SNHL and to determine if these effects of release time and reverberation can be predicted using indices of audibility or temporal and spectral distortion. Research Design This is a quasi-experimental cohort study. Participants used a hearing aid simulator set to the Desired Sensation Level algorithm m[i/o] for three different amplitude compression release times. Reverberation was simulated using three different reverberation times. Participants Participants were 20 children and 16 adults with SNHL. Data Collection and Analyses Participants were seated in a sound-attenuating booth and then nonsense syllable recognition was measured. Predictions of speech recognition were made using indices of audibility, temporal distortion, and spectral distortion and the effects of release time and reverberation were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results While nonsense syllable recognition decreased in reverberation release time did not significantly affect nonsense syllable recognition. Participants with lower audibility were more susceptible to the negative effect of reverberation on nonsense syllable recognition. Conclusion We have extended previous work on the effects of reverberation on aided speech recognition to children with SNHL. Variations in release time did not impact the understanding of speech. An index of audibility best predicted nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation and, clinically, these results suggest that patients with less audibility are more susceptible to nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Choi, Ji Eun
    Kim, Jinryoul
    Yoon, Sung Hoon
    Hong, Sung Hwa
    Moon, Il Joon
    JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [22] Audibility-Based Hearing Aid Fitting Criteria for Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss
    McCreery, Ryan W.
    Walker, Elizabeth A.
    Stiles, Derek J.
    Spratford, Meredith
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Lewis, Dawna E.
    LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2020, 51 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [23] Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults
    Kane, Stacey G.
    Dean, Kelly M.
    Buss, Emily
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (09): : 3617 - 3626
  • [24] Effect of compression release time of a hearing aid on sentence recognition and the quality judgment of speech
    Shetty, Hemanth Narayan
    Raju, Suma
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2019, 21 (103) : 232 - 241
  • [25] Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth on Speech Recognition Performance of Listeners Using a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid (Bimodal Hearing)
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (05) : 553 - 561
  • [26] The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception far normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children
    Stelmachowicz, PG
    Hoover, BM
    Lewis, DE
    Kortekaas, RWL
    Pittman, AL
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (04): : 902 - 914
  • [27] Speech recognition with a hearing-aid processing scheme combining beamforming with mask-informed speech enhancement
    Green, Tim
    Hilkhuysen, Gaston
    Huckvale, Mark
    Rosen, Stuart
    Brookes, Mike
    Moore, Alastair
    Naylor, Patrick
    Lightburn, Leo
    Xue, Wei
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2022, 26
  • [28] Assessing Speech Audibility via Syllabic-Rate Neural Responses in Adults and Children With and Without Hearing Loss
    Pendyala, Varsha
    Sethares, William
    Easwar, Vijayalakshmi
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [29] Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition
    Perry, Trevor T.
    Nelson, Peggy B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 31 (02) : 305 - 321
  • [30] Speech Recognition Performance under Noisy Conditions of Children with Hearing Loss
    Yang, Hui-Mei
    Hsieh, Yi-Jung
    Wu, Jiunn-Liang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 5 : S73 - S75