Development and optimization of an Agro-BGC ecosystem model for C4 perennial grasses

被引:32
|
作者
Di Vittorio, Alan V. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Ryan S. [3 ]
White, Joseph D. [4 ]
Miller, Norman L. [2 ,5 ]
Running, Steven W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Energy Biosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Div Earth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Numer Terradynam Simulat Grp, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[4] Baylor Univ, Inst Ecol Earth & Environm Sci, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Geog, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Agro-BGC; Bioenergy; Biome-BGC; Carbon; Ecosystem model; Switchgrass; PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY NPP; COMPARING GLOBAL-MODELS; NORTHERN GREAT-PLAINS; BIOMASS YIELD; UNITED-STATES; INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE; COMPLEX TERRAIN; USE EFFICIENCY; SOUTHERN IOWA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.05.013
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Extrapolating simulations of bioenergy crop agro-ecosystems beyond data-rich sites requires biophysically accurate ecosystem models and careful estimation of model parameters not available in the literature. To increase biophysical accuracy we added C-4 perennial grass functionality and agricultural practices to the Biome-BGC (BioGeochemical Cycles) ecosystem model. This new model, Agro-BGC, includes enzyme-driven C-4 photosynthesis, individual live and dead leaf, stem, and root carbon and nitrogen pools, separate senescence and litter fall processes, fruit growth, optional annual seeding, flood irrigation, a growing degree day phenology with a killing frost option, and a disturbance handler that simulates nitrogen fertilization, harvest, fire, and incremental irrigation. To obtain spatially generalizable vegetation parameters we used a numerical method to optimize five unavailable parameters for Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) using biomass yield data from three sites: Mead, Nebraska, Rockspring, Pennsylvania, and Mandan, North Dakota. We then verified simulated switchgrass yields at three independent sites in Illinois (IL). Agro-BGC is more accurate than Biome-BGC in representing the physiology and dynamics of C-4 grass and management practices associated with agro-ecosystems. The simulated two-year average mature yields with single-site Rockspring optimization have Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of 70, 152, and 162 and biases of 43, -87, 156 g carbon m(-2) for Shabbona, Urbana, and Simpson IL respectively. The simulated annual yields in June, August, October, December, and February have RMSEs of 114, 390, and 185 and biases of -19, -258, and 147 g carbon m(-2) for Shabbona, Urbana, and Simpson IL respectively. These RMSE and bias values are all within the largest 90% confidence interval around respective IL site measurements. Twenty-four of twenty-six simulated annual yields with Rockspring optimization are within 95% confidence intervals of Illinois site measurements during the mature fourth and fifth years of growth. Ten of eleven simulated two-year average mature yields with Rockspring optimization are within 65% confidence intervals of Illinois site measurements and the eleventh is within the 95% confidence interval. Rockspring optimized Agro-BGC achieves accuracies comparable to those of two previously published models: Agricultural Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) and Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM). Agro-BGC suffers from static vegetation parameters that can change seasonally and as plants age. Using mature plant data for optimization mitigates this deficiency. Our results suggest that a multi-site optimization scheme using mature plant data from more sites would be adequate for generating spatially generalizable vegetation parameters for simulating mature bioenergy crop agro-ecosystems with Agro-BGC. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2038 / 2053
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Validation of an agroecosystem process model (AGRO-BGC) on annual and perennial bioenergy feedstocks
    Hunt, Natalie D.
    Gower, Stith T.
    Nadelhoffer, Knute
    Lajtha, Kate
    Townsend, Kimberly
    Brye, Kristofor R.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 321 : 23 - 34
  • [2] Senescence, dormancy and tillering in perennial C4 grasses
    Sarath, Gautam
    Baird, Lisa M.
    Mitchell, Robert B.
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 217 : 140 - 151
  • [3] C4 bioenergy crops for cool climates, with special emphasis on perennial C4 grasses
    Sage, Rowan F.
    Peixoto, Murilo de Melo
    Friesen, Patrick
    Deen, Bill
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2015, 66 (14) : 4195 - 4212
  • [4] Simulating diverse native C4 perennial grasses with varying rainfall
    Kim, Sumin
    Williams, Amber
    Kiniry, James R.
    Hawkes, Christine V.
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2016, 134 : 97 - 103
  • [5] The potential of C4 perennial grasses for developing global BIOHEAT industry
    Samson, R
    Mani, S
    Boddey, R
    Sokhansanj, S
    Quesada, D
    Urquiaga, S
    Reis, V
    Lem, CH
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (5-6) : 461 - 495
  • [6] Lignocellulosic Biomass of C3 and C4 Perennial Grasses as a Valuable Feedstock for Particleboard Manufacture
    Janiszewska, Dominika
    Zurek, Grzegorz
    Martyniak, Danuta
    Baleczny, Wojciech
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (18)
  • [7] Linkage mapping evidence for a syntenic QTL associated with flowering time in perennial C4 rhizomatous grasses Miscanthus and switchgrass
    Jensen, Elaine
    Shafiei, Reza
    Ma, Xue-Feng
    Serba, Desalegn D.
    Smith, Daniel P.
    Slavov, Gancho T.
    Robson, Paul
    Farrar, Kerrie
    Jones, Sian Thomas
    Swaller, Timothy
    Flavell, Richard
    Clifton-Brown, John
    Saha, Malay C.
    Donnison, Iain
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2021, 13 (01): : 98 - 111
  • [8] Influence of double-cut harvest system on biomass yield, quality and biogas production from C4 perennial grasses
    Kuprys-Caruk, Marta
    Podlaski, Slawomir
    Kotyrba, Danuta
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 130
  • [9] Cultivation of C4 perennial energy grasses on heavy metal contaminated arable land: Impact on soil, biomass, and photosynthetic traits
    Rusinowski, S.
    Krzyzak, J.
    Sitko, K.
    Kalaji, H. M.
    Jensen, E.
    Pogrzeba, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 250 : 300 - 311
  • [10] Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks
    Jakob, Katrin
    Zhou, Fasong
    Paterson, Andrew H.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2009, 45 (03) : 291 - 305