Differentiating solitary brain metastases from high-grade gliomas with MR: comparing qualitative versus quantitative diagnostic strategies

被引:10
|
作者
Voicu, Ioan Paul [1 ]
Pravata, Emanuele [2 ]
Panara, Valentina [3 ,4 ]
Navarra, Riccardo [3 ]
Mattei, Peter A. [3 ]
Caulo, Massimo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] G Mazzini Hosp, Dept Imaging, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
[2] Osped Reg Lugano, Neuroradiol Dept, Neuroctr Southern Switzerland, Via Tesserete 46, CH-6901 Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Univ G DAnnunzio, ITAB Inst Adv Biomed Technol, Dept Neurosci & Imaging, Chieti, Italy
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio Chieti, Dept Radiol, Chieti, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2022年 / 127卷 / 08期
关键词
Brain neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Glioma; Neoplasm metastasis; Perfusion; Area under curve; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; PERITUMORAL EDEMA; SIGNAL INTENSITY; PERFUSION; SINGLE; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERMEABILITY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-022-01516-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of MRI diagnostic algorithms with an ascending automatization, in distinguishing between high-grade glioma (HGG) and solitary brain metastases (SBM). Methods 36 patients with histologically proven HGG (n = 18) or SBM (n = 18), matched by size and location were enrolled from a database containing 655 patients. Four different diagnostic algorithms were performed serially to mimic the clinical setting where a radiologist would typically seek out further findings to reach a decision: pure qualitative, analytic qualitative (based on standardized evaluation of tumor features), semi-quantitative (based on perfusion and diffusion cutoffs included in the literature) and a quantitative data-driven algorithm of the perfusion and diffusion parameters. The diagnostic yields of the four algorithms were tested with ROC analysis and Kendall coefficient of concordance. Results Qualitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 72.2%, specificity of 78.8%, and AUC of 0.75. Analytic qualitative algorithm distinguished HGG from SBM with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 77.7%, and an AUC of 0.889. The semi-quantitative algorithm yielded sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 83.3%, and AUC = 0.889. The data-driven algorithm yielded sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 100%, and AUC = 0.948. The concordance analysis between the four algorithms and the histologic findings showed moderate concordance for the first algorithm, (k = 0.501, P < 0.01), good concordance for the second (k = 0.798, P < 0.01), and third (k = 0.783, P < 0.01), and excellent concordance for fourth (k = 0.901, p < 0.0001). Conclusion When differentiating HGG from SBM, an analytical qualitative algorithm outperformed qualitative algorithm, and obtained similar results compared to the semi-quantitative approach. However, the use of data-driven quantitative algorithm yielded an excellent differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 898
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differentiation of high-grade-astrocytomas from solitary-brain-metastases: Comparing diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging
    Tan, Yan
    Wang, Xiao-Chun
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Jun
    Qin, Jiang-Bo
    Wu, Xiao-Feng
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Le
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2618 - 2624
  • [32] Meta-analysis of peritumoural rCBV values derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging in differentiating high-grade gliomas from intracranial metastases
    Liang, Ruofei
    Wang, Xiang
    Li, Mao
    Yang, Yuan
    Luo, Jiewen
    Mao, Qing
    Liu, Yanhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (09): : 2724 - 2729
  • [33] Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings
    I. Chan Chiang
    Yu-Ting Kuo
    Chia-Ying Lu
    Kwok-Wan Yeung
    Wei-Chen Lin
    Feng-O. Sheu
    Gin-Chung Liu
    Neuroradiology, 2004, 46 : 619 - 627
  • [34] Efficacy of MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating low-grade from high-grade glioma before surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Chang
    Li, Chenglong
    Xing, Chengyan
    Li, Jun
    Jiang, Xingyue
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 220
  • [35] Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings
    Chiang, IC
    Kuo, YT
    Lu, CY
    Yeung, KW
    Lin, WC
    Sheu, FO
    Liu, GC
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2004, 46 (08) : 619 - 627
  • [36] Potential role of quantitative MRI assessment in differentiating high from low-grade gliomas
    Geneidi, Eman A. Sh.
    Habib, Lobna A.
    Chalabi, Nivine A.
    Haschim, Mohamed H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 47 (01) : 243 - 253
  • [37] Distinguishing Recurrent High-grade Gliomas from Radiation Injury: A Pilot Study Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Bisdas, Sotirios
    Naegele, Thomas
    Ritz, Rainer
    Dimostheni, Artemisia
    Pfannenberg, Christina
    Reimold, Matthias
    Koh, Tong San
    Ernemann, Ulrike
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (05) : 575 - 583
  • [38] The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating high-from low-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Qun
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhang, JiaShu
    Wu, Chen
    Zhu, WeiJie
    Li, FangYe
    Chen, XiaoLei
    Xu, BaiNan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (08) : 2670 - 2684
  • [39] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Differentiating High-Grade Glioma from Solitary Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Suh, C. H.
    Kim, H. S.
    Jung, S. C.
    Kim, S. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (07) : 1208 - 1214
  • [40] Potential role of fractional anisotropy derived from diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating high-grade gliomas from low-grade gliomas: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Ruofei
    Wang, Xiang
    Li, Mao
    Yang, Yuan
    Luo, Jiewen
    Mao, Qing
    Liu, Yanhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (10): : 3647 - 3653