Sex differences in large conducting airway anatomy

被引:80
|
作者
Dominelli, Paolo B. [1 ]
Ripoll, Juan G. [1 ]
Cross, Troy J. [2 ,3 ]
Baker, Sarah E. [1 ]
Wiggins, Chad C. [1 ]
Welch, Brian T. [4 ]
Joyner, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
dysanapsis; exercise; work of breathing; RESPIRATORY MUSCLE WORK; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; HEART-FAILURE; BLOOD-FLOW; EXPIRATORY FLOW; GAS-EXCHANGE; LUNG-VOLUME; NORMAL MEN; EXERCISE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2018
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men (n = 51) and women (n = 73) of varying ages (19-86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m(2) were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were similar to 26%-35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 +/- 47 vs. 195 +/- 28 mm(2) or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 +/- 15 vs. 42 +/- 9 mm(2) or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being similar to 20%-30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area (r = 0.73-0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (similar to 26%-35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%-30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men.
引用
收藏
页码:960 / 965
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sex Differences in Airway Remodeling in a Mouse Model of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Tam, Anthony
    Churg, Andrew
    Wright, Joanne L.
    Zhou, Steven
    Kirby, Miranda
    Coxson, Harvey O.
    Lam, Stephen
    Man, S. F. Paul
    Sin, Don D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193 (08) : 825 - 834
  • [22] Sex Differences in Human Thermoregulation: Relevance for 2020 and Beyond
    Yanovich, R.
    Ketko, I.
    Charkoudian, N.
    PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [23] Sex differences in central and peripheral mechanisms of fatigue in cyclists
    Glace, Beth W.
    Kremenic, Ian J.
    McHugh, Malachy P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 113 (04) : 1091 - 1098
  • [24] Baseline differences in the HF-ACTION trial by sex
    Pina, Ileana L.
    Kokkinos, Peter
    Kao, Andrew
    Bittner, Vera
    Saval, Matt
    Clare, Bob
    Goldberg, Lee
    Johnson, Maryl
    Swank, Ann
    Ventura, Hector
    Moe, Gordon
    Fitz-Gerald, Meredith
    Ellis, Stephen J.
    Vest, Marianne
    Cooper, Lawton
    Whellan, David
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 158 (04) : S16 - S23
  • [25] Sex differences in mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist trials: a pooled analysis of three large clinical trials
    Rossello, Xavier
    Ferreira, Joao Pedro
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    McMurray, John J. V.
    Solomon, Scott D.
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    Girerd, Nicolas
    Pitt, Bertram
    Rossignol, Patrick
    Zannad, Faiez
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 (05) : 834 - 844
  • [26] Sex differences in claudication pain in subjects with peripheral arterial disease
    Gardner, AW
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2002, 34 (11): : 1695 - 1698
  • [27] Sex Differences in Physical Capacities of German Bundesliga Soccer Players
    Cardoso de Araujo, Maithe
    Baumgart, Christian
    Jansen, Christian T.
    Freiwald, Juergen
    Hoppe, Matthias W.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (08) : 2329 - 2337
  • [28] Sex differences in response to cognitive stress during a fatiguing contraction
    Yoon, Tejin
    Keller, Manda L.
    De-Lap, Bonnie Schlinder
    Harkins, April
    Lepers, Romuald
    Hunter, Sandra K.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 107 (05) : 1486 - 1496
  • [29] Sex differences in diaphragmatic fatigue: the cardiovascular response to inspiratory resistance
    Welch, Joseph F.
    Archiza, Bruno
    Guenette, Jordan A.
    West, Christopher R.
    Sheel, A. William
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2018, 596 (17): : 4017 - 4032
  • [30] Sex differences in ICD benefit
    Bergau, Leonard
    Seegers, Joachim
    Zabel, Markus
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2014, 47 (06) : 869 - 873