Equality trouble: Sameness and difference in twentieth-century race law

被引:43
作者
Harris, AP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Law, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3481212
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In this Essay, Professor Harris suggests that "race law" consists not only of antidiscrimination law, but law pertaining to the formation, recognition, and maintenance of racial groups, as well as the law regulating the relationships among these groups. Harris argues that a constant tension in the story of race law in the past century has been the effort to reconcile constitutional and statutory norms of equality with the desire for white dominance. rn the first part of the century, if was assumed that the fact of racial difference required management through sound public policy; in the second part of the century, race gradually became understood as an arbitrary distinction that the law should ignore. Neither treating race as difference nor as sameness, however, has succeeded in accomplishing racial justice.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / +
页数:93
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], AM INDIAN POLICY CRI
  • [12] APPIAH KA, 1992, MY FATHERS HOUSE AFR, P13
  • [13] ARRIOLA C, 1995, LA RAZA LJ, V8, P182
  • [14] Arriola Christopher, 1995, LA RAZA LAW J, V8, P166
  • [15] When does private discrimination justify public affirmative action?
    Ayres, I
    Vars, FE
    [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 98 (07) : 1577 - 1641
  • [16] Balibar Etienne., 1991, Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities
  • [17] BAYER PB, 1987, UC DAVIS L REV, V20, P769
  • [18] BEDERMAN G, 1995, MANLINESS CIVILIZATI, P134
  • [19] Bederman Gail, 1995, Manliness and Civilization: a Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States 1880-1917, P25
  • [20] BENEDICT ML, 1979, 1978 SUP CT REV, P41