A voxel matching method for effective leaf area index estimation in temperate deciduous forests from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data

被引:31
|
作者
Zhu, Xi [1 ]
Liu, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Skidmore, Andrew K. [1 ,4 ]
Premier, Joe [5 ]
Heurich, Marco [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Macquarie Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[5] Bavarian Forest Natl Pk, Freyunger Str 2, D-94481 Grafenau, Germany
[6] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Chair Wildlife Ecol & Management, Freiburg, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Effective leaf area index; Airborne LiDAR; Leaf-off; Leaf-on; Voxel matching; TERRESTRIAL LIDAR; INDIVIDUAL TREES; HIGH-RESOLUTION; ANGLE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-VALIDATION; GAP FRACTION; CANOPY; HEIGHT; METRICS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2020.111696
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The quantification of leaf area index (LAI) is essential for modeling the interaction between atmosphere and biosphere. The airborne LiDAR has emerged as an effective tool for mapping plant area index (PAI) in a landscape consisting of both woody and leaf materials. However, the discrimination between woody and leaf materials and the estimation of effective LAI (eLAI) have, to date, rarely been studied at landscape scale. We applied a voxel matching algorithm to estimate eLAI of deciduous forests using simulated and field LiDAR data under leaf-on and leaf-off conditions. We classified LiDAR points as either a leaf or a woody hit on leaf-on LiDAR data by matching the point with leaf-off data. We compared the eLAI result of our voxel matching algorithm against the subtraction method, where the leaf-off effective woody area index (eWAI) is subtracted from the effective leaf-on PAI (ePAI). Our results, which were validated against terrestrial LiDAR derived eLAI, showed that the voxel matching method, with an optimal voxel size of 0.1 m, produced an unbiased estimation of terrestrial LiDAR derived eLAI with an R-2 of 0.70 and an RMSE of 0.41 (RRMSE: 20.1%). The subtraction method, however, yielded an R-2 of 0.62 and an RMSE of 1.02 (RRMSE: 50.1%) with a significant underestimation of 0.94. Reassuringly, the same outcome was observed using a simulated dataset. In addition, we evaluated the performance of 96 LiDAR metrics under leaf-on conditions for eLAI prediction using a statistical model. Based on the importance scores derived from the random forest regression, nine of the 96 leaf-on LiDAR metrics were selected. Cross-validation showed that eLAI could be predicted using these metrics under leaf-on conditions with an R-2 of 0.73 and an RMSE of 0.27 (RRMSE: 17.4%). The voxel matching method yielded a slightly lower accuracy (R-2: 0.70, RMSE:0.41, RRMSE: 20.1%) than the statistical model. We, therefore, suggest that the voxel matching method offers a new opportunity for the estimating eLAI and other ecological applications that require the classification between leaf and woody materials using airborne LiDAR data. It potentially allows transferability to different sites and flight campaigns.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of different sensors and leaf-on and leaf-off canopy conditions on echo distributions and individual tree properties derived from airborne laser scanning
    Orka, Hans Ole
    Naesset, Erik
    Bollandsas, Ole Martin
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (07) : 1445 - 1461
  • [12] The Suitability of Leaf-off Airborne Laser Scanning Data in an Area-based Forest Inventory of Coniferous and Deciduous Trees
    Villikka, Maria
    Packalen, Petteri
    Maltamo, Matti
    SILVA FENNICA, 2012, 46 (01) : 99 - 110
  • [13] Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration success
    Moudry, Vitezslav
    Gdulova, Katerina
    Fogl, Michal
    Klapste, Petr
    Urban, Rudolf
    Komarek, Jan
    Moudra, Lucie
    Stroner, Martin
    Bartak, Vojtech
    Solsky, Milic
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 104 : 32 - 41
  • [14] A LiDAR-Driven Effective Leaf Area Index Inversion Method of Urban Forests in Northeast China
    Zhai, Chang
    Ding, Mingming
    Ren, Zhibin
    Bao, Guangdao
    Liu, Ting
    Zhang, Zhonghui
    Jiang, Xuefei
    Ma, Hongbo
    Lin, Haisen
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (10):
  • [15] Riparian trees genera identification based on leaf-on/leaf-off airborne laser scanner data and machine learning classifiers in northern France
    Ba, A.
    Laslier, M.
    Dufour, S.
    Hubert-Moy, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 41 (05) : 1645 - 1667
  • [16] Comparative Performances of Airborne LiDAR Height and Intensity Data for Leaf Area Index Estimation
    Luo, Shezhou
    Chen, Jing M.
    Wang, Cheng
    Gonsamo, Alemu
    Xi, Xiaohuan
    Lin, Yi
    Qian, Mingjie
    Peng, Dailiang
    Nie, Sheng
    Qin, Haiming
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 11 (01) : 300 - 310
  • [17] Mapping forest structure and uncertainty in an urban area using leaf-off lidar data
    Gu, Huan
    Townsend, Philip A.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (02) : 497 - 509
  • [18] A New Strategy for Individual Tree Detection and Segmentation from Leaf-on and Leaf-off UAV-LiDAR Point Clouds Based on Automatic Detection of Seed Points
    Pu, Yihan
    Xu, Dandan
    Wang, Haobin
    Li, Xin
    Xu, Xia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [19] Comparison of Canopy Cover and Leaf Area Index Estimation from Airborne LiDAR and Digital Aerial Photogrammetry in Tropical Forests
    Li, Chenyun
    Zheng, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Xinjie
    Wu, Fayun
    Li, Linyuan
    Jiang, Jingyi
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [20] Forest leaf area index (LAI) inversion using airborne LiDAR data
    Luo She-Zhou
    Wang Cheng
    Zhang Gui-Bin
    Xi Xiao-Huan
    Li Gui-Cai
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2013, 56 (05): : 1467 - 1475