Comparing the explicit and implicit attitudes of energy stakeholders and the public towards carbon capture and storage

被引:30
作者
Sun, Yan [1 ,5 ]
Li, Yang [2 ]
Cai, Bo-feng [3 ]
Li, Qi [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Business, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Climate & Environm Policy, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, IRSM, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental technologies; Carbon capture and storage; Implicit association test; Implicit attitudes; Explicit attitudes; POWER-PLANTS; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL COGNITION; ASSOCIATION TEST; REAL-OPTIONS; CCS; CHINA; CO2; ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on the attitudes of energy stakeholders and the general public towards Carbon Capture and Storage is a necessary starting point for the industry to understand the development trajectory of the technology. However, previous studies have only used explicit approaches, such as self-report questionnaires, to measure attitudes. Some researchers have argued that explicit measures are not able to reflect participants' true thoughts. To investigate the potential gap between the results of explicit tests and the true attitudes of participants, this study uses the implicit association test, to detect the attitudes towards environmental technology for the first time (to our knowledge), by comparing the explicit and implicit attitudes of energy stakeholders and the public towards carbon capture and storage. The results indicate that energy stakeholders hold favorable attitudes, whereas public vary across the two tests. Public show supportive attitudes in the explicit test, but present their concerns about the risk of carbon capture and storage in the implicit test. The inconsistencies between the explicit and implicit test results among the public indicate that researchers need to be very cautious about the method they use to understand attitudes towards carbon capture and storage as well as other environmental technologies. Further, we suggested that implicit association test would be an effective and easy-to-use approach to complement traditional explicit tests to discover participants' real attitudes towards environmental technologies in the future research. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Acorn: Developing full-chain industrial carbon capture and storage in a resource- and infrastructure-rich hydrocarbon province
    Alcalde, Juan
    Heinemann, Niklas
    Mabon, Leslie
    Worden, Richard H.
    de Coninck, Heleen
    Robertson, Hazel
    Maver, Marko
    Ghanbari, Saeed
    Swennenhuis, Floris
    Mann, Indira
    Walker, Tiana
    Gomersal, Sam
    Bond, Clare E.
    Allen, Michael J.
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    James, Alan
    Mackay, Eric J.
    Brownsort, Peter A.
    Faulkner, Daniel R.
    Murphy, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 963 - 971
  • [2] [Anonymous], EUR J MARKET
  • [3] [Anonymous], DUTCH EVALUATE CCS O
  • [4] Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany
    Arning, K.
    Offermann-van Heek, J.
    Linzenich, A.
    Kaetelhoen, A.
    Sternberg, A.
    Bardow, A.
    Ziefle, M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 125 : 235 - 249
  • [5] Acceptance profiles for a carbon-derived foam mattress. Exploring and segmenting consumer perceptions of a carbon capture and utilization product
    Arning, Katrin
    van Heek, Julia
    Ziefle, Martina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 171 - 184
  • [6] Developments in public communications on CCS
    Ashworth, Peta
    Wade, Sarah
    Reiner, David
    Liang, Xi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 : 449 - 458
  • [7] What's in store: Lessons from implementing CCS
    Ashworth, Peta
    Bradbury, Judith
    Wade, Sarah
    Feenstra, C. F. J. Ynke
    Greenberg, Sallie
    Hund, Gretchen
    Mikunda, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 9 : 402 - 409
  • [8] Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach
    Bellamy, Rob
    Lezaun, Javier
    Palmer, James
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 45 : 194 - 202
  • [9] Persuasiveness, importance and novelty of arguments about Carbon Capture and Storage
    Broecks, Kevin P. F.
    van Egmond, Sander
    van Rijnsoever, Frank J.
    Verlinde-van den Berg, Marlies
    Hekkert, Marko P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 59 : 58 - 66
  • [10] Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption
    Brough, Aaron R.
    Wilkie, James E. B.
    Ma, Jingjing
    Isaac, Mathew S.
    Gal, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2016, 43 (04) : 567 - 582