Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school

被引:5
作者
Brown, Lucy [1 ]
Swiezy, Sarah [1 ]
McKinzie, Alexandra [1 ]
Komanapalli, Sarah [1 ]
Bernard, Caitlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, 340 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Abortion; Medical education; Undergraduate medical curriculum; Pregnancy options counseling; Contraceptive counseling;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients, and 3) preferred modality of instruction.Study design:A survey assessed students about UMC. Course syllabus learning objectives and APGO educational guidelines were compared.Results: There were 309 responses total; six did not complete all survey questions and were excluded. Participants (n 1/4 303) were primarily female (62%) and White (74%). Across all class levels, many (61%) students expected to learn about family planning and contraception in UMC. While most (84-88%) participants who completed the preclinical course with or without the clerkship felt prepared to counsel about common, non-controversial pharmacotherapies, only 20% of students felt prepared to counsel on abortion options, and 75% of students who had completed both the preclinical and OBGYN clerkship felt unprepared for abortion counseling Overall, 86% of all students surveyed believed that the medical school should enhance its reproductive health coverage in UMC. Traditional lectures, panels, and direct clinical exposure were the most popular instructional modalities.Conclusion: We identified potential gaps in UMC where students expressed high level of interest with low level of preparedness regarding abortion options counseling, even among senior students. Considering the high percentage of students expecting to learn about pregnancy termination and family planning in their UMC, this expectation is not being met. Students were open to a variety of modalities of instruction, indicating that several possible options exist for curricular integration.Implications: Despite evidence of need for training in family planning and abortion, few medical institutions have a standardized curriculum. Little available literature exists on curricula covering pregnancy options and contraception counseling, signifying a gap of knowledge and an opportunity to study how to integrate these important topics into UMC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, IU SCH MED DIV FACT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, APGO MED STUD ED OBJ, Veleventh
  • [3] Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search
    Cartwright, Alice F.
    Karunaratne, Mihiri
    Barr-Walker, Jill
    Johns, Nicole E.
    Upadhyay, Ushma D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (05)
  • [4] Curriculum Reform Interest Survey, MED STUD CHOIC
  • [5] Abortion education in medical schools: A national survey
    Espey, E
    Ogburn, T
    Chavez, A
    Qualls, C
    Leyba, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (02) : 640 - 643
  • [6] Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008-2014
    Jones, Rachel K.
    Jerman, Jenna
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (12) : 1904 - 1909
  • [7] Lupi Carla S, 2017, MedEdPORTAL, V13, P10566, DOI 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10566
  • [8] Team-based learning: a novel approach to medical student education in family planning
    Mody, Sheila K.
    Kiley, Jessica
    Gawron, Lori
    Garcia, Patricia
    Hammond, Cassing
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (02) : 239 - 242
  • [9] Pomerantz T., 2019, MEDEDPORTAL, V15
  • [10] "It Allows You to Challenge Your Beliefs": Examining Medical Students' Reactions to First Trimester Abortion
    Rivlin, Katherine
    Sedlander, Erica
    Cepin, Ana
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2020, 30 (05) : 353 - 358