Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: The concept and data analysis

被引:418
作者
Knezevic, Stevan Z.
Streibig, Jens C.
Ritz, Christian
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Haskell Agr Lab, Concord, NE 68728 USA
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Agr Sci, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Nat Sci, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
nonlinear regression; experimental design; weed dry matter;
D O I
10.1614/WT-06-161.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Advances in statistical software allow statistical methods for nonlinear regression analysis of dose-response curves to be carried out conveniently by non-staristicians. One such statistical software is the program R with the drc extension package. The drc package can: (1) simultaneously Pit multiple dose-response curves; (2) compare curve parameters for significant differences; (3) calculate any point along the curve at the response level of interest, commonly known as an effective dose (e.g., ED30, ED50, ED90), and determine its significance; and (4) generate graphs for publications or presentations. We believe that the drc package has advantages that include: the ability to relatively simply and quickly compare multiple curves and select ED-levels easily along the curve with relevant statistics; the package is free of charge and does not require licensing fees, and the size of the package is only 70 MB. Therefore, our objectives are to: (1) provide a review of a few common issues in dose-response-curve fitting, and (2) facilitate the use of up-to-date statistical techniques for analysis of dose-response curves with this software. The methods described can be utilized to evaluate chemical and non-chemical weed control options. Benefits to the practitioners and academics are also presented.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 848
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]   EFFECTS OF FLAME WEEDING ON WEED SPECIES AT DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES [J].
ASCARD, J .
WEED RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (05) :397-411
[3]   DOSE-RESPONSE MODELS FOR FLAME WEEDING IN RELATION TO PLANT SIZE AND DENSITY [J].
ASCARD, J .
WEED RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (05) :377-385
[4]   A new approach to determine when to control weeds [J].
Berti, A ;
Dunan, C ;
Sattin, M ;
Zanin, G ;
Westra, P .
WEED SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (03) :496-503
[5]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PRIMISULFURON AND SELECTED SOIL-APPLIED INSECTICIDES IN CORN (ZEA-MAYS) [J].
BIEDIGER, DL ;
BAUMANN, PA ;
WEAVER, DN ;
CHANDLER, JM ;
MERKLE, MG .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 6 (04) :807-812
[6]   AN EQUATION TO DESCRIBE DOSE RESPONSES WHERE THERE IS STIMULATION OF GROWTH AT LOW-DOSES [J].
BRAIN, P ;
COUSENS, R .
WEED RESEARCH, 1989, 29 (02) :93-96
[7]   Toxicology rethinks its central belief - Hormesis demands a reappraisal of the way risks are assessed. [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
NATURE, 2003, 421 (6924) :691-692
[8]   Overcompensation stimulation: A mechanism for hormetic effects [J].
Calabrese, EJ .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 31 (4-5) :425-470
[9]   U-shaped dose-responses in biology, toxicology, and public health [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 22 :15-33
[10]   Improved empirical models describing hormesis [J].
Cedergreen, N ;
Ritz, C ;
Streibig, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2005, 24 (12) :3166-3172