Comparing the time-eigenvalues of the natural mode equation by weight balancing and α-k methods

被引:3
作者
Nauchi, Yasushi [1 ]
Jinaphanh, Alexis [2 ]
Zoia, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Res Inst Elect Power Ind CRIEPI, 2-6-1 Nagasaka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2400196, Japan
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, DEN Serv Etud Reacteurs & Math Appl SERMA, CEA, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
Time-eigenvalue; Natural mode equation; Weight balancing; alpha-k method; CROCUS; ITERATED FISSION PROBABILITY; PERTURBATION; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108486
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The time-eigenvalues a of the natural mode equation are calculated for the CROCUS benchmark models corresponding to 11 water levels using suitable modifications of the power iteration of fission source in the MCNP-5 and TRIPOLI-4 (R) codes. To model the time annihilation or source term in the natural mode equation, the weight balancing method has been implemented in MCNP-5, whereas the alpha-k method has been implemented in TRIPOLI-4 (R). For the calculations, thoroughly verified input models are prepared for the MCNP-5 and TRIPOLI-4 (R) codes, so to have coherent effective multiplication factors k(eff). In the comparison of the time eigenvalues by the two methods, divergence and sign flip raise some issues for the configurations just near criticality. To overcome these problems, a novel estimator based on the shift of the eigenvalue from the minimum value is studied in this work. Here, the minimum value is taken as the opposite of the smallest decay constant of the delayed neutron precursors, lambda(j). Based on our numerical simulations, we have verified the agreement of both methods, although all the tested estimators turn out to be possibly very sensitive to small discrepancies in the multiplication factor between the codes. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bell G.I., 1970, NUCL REACTOR THEORY
[2]  
Briesmeister JF., 2000, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report
[3]  
Brockway D., 1985, Technical Report LA-UR-85-1224
[4]  
Duderstadt J.J., 1976, Nuclear reactor analysis
[5]   Sensitivity analysis of prompt neutron decay constant using perturbation theory [J].
Endo, Tomohiro ;
Yamamoto, Akio .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 55 (11) :1245-1254
[6]   Perturbation and sensitivity calculations for time eigenvalues using the Generalized Iterated Fission Probability [J].
Jinaphanh, A. ;
Zoia, A. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 133 (678-687) :678-687
[7]  
JOSEY C., 2019, P INT C MATH COMP ME, P948
[8]  
KEEPIN G.R., 1965, Physics of Nuclear Kinetics
[9]  
Lamarsh J.R., 1965, Introduction to nuclear reactor theory
[10]  
Misawa T., 2010, Nuclear Reactor Physics Experiments