Understanding the Interaction between Regulatory Focus and Message Framing in Determining Chinese Consumers' Attitudes toward Artificial Meat

被引:5
作者
Shi, Hongxu [1 ]
Ma, Peihua [2 ]
Zeng, Yinchu [1 ]
Sheng, Jiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Nutr & Food Sci, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
关键词
artificial meat; consumer attitude; regulatory focus; structural equation modeling; moderating effect; CULTURED MEAT; PERCEIVED BENEFITS; FOOD; PERCEPTIONS; INNOVATION; RISK; ASSOCIATIONS; COMPONENTS; PRODUCTS; PLEASURE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19094948
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While production and consumption of meat cast a shadow over the prospects for sustainable development, artificial meat may be the solution. However, consumer acceptability of artificial meat is a major impediment to its use as a suitable alternative. This study analyzed the relationship between regulatory focus and consumer acceptance of artificial meat using randomized controlled trial data. Results showed that promotion focus results in a higher acceptance of artificial meat products due to a higher perceived benefit and lower perceived risk, whereas prevention focus results in a lower acceptance of artificial meat products due to perceived benefit being lower and perceived risk being higher. The moderating effect of the message framing was investigated employing structural equation modeling (SEM). It was discovered that a gain-oriented message framing could greatly strengthen the association between promotion focus and perceived benefit, whereas an avoidance-oriented message framing could significantly diminish the relationship between prevention focus and perceived risk. This study has crucial implications for how policymakers and industries communicate with consumers about artificial meat.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Are consumers willing to pay for in-vitro meat? An investigation of naming effects [J].
Asioli, Daniele ;
Bazzani, Claudia ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 73 (02) :356-375
[2]   Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all Web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study [J].
Bart, Y ;
Shankar, V ;
Sultan, F ;
Urban, GL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :133-152
[3]   Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat [J].
Bekker, Gerben A. ;
Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;
Tobi, Hilde ;
van Trijp, Hans C. M. .
APPETITE, 2017, 108 :245-254
[4]   Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe [J].
Bellarby, Jessica ;
Tirado, Reyes ;
Leip, Adrian ;
Weiss, Franz ;
Lesschen, Jan Peter ;
Smith, Pete .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (01) :3-18
[5]   PERCEIVED RISK AND ITS COMPONENTS - MODEL AND EMPIRICAL TEST [J].
BETTMAN, JR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1973, 10 (02) :184-190
[6]   Technological, Regulatory, and Ethical Aspects of In Vitro Meat: A Future Slaughter-Free Harvest [J].
Bhat, Zuhaib F. ;
Morton, James D. ;
Mason, Susan L. ;
Bekhit, Alaa El-Din A. ;
Bhat, Hina F. .
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2019, 18 (04) :1192-1208
[7]   Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare [J].
Bonnet, Celine ;
Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra ;
Requillart, Vincent ;
Treich, Nicolas .
FOOD POLICY, 2020, 97
[8]   Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry [J].
Bonny, Sarah P. F. ;
Gardner, Graham E. ;
Pethick, David W. ;
Hocquette, Jean-Francois .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (11) :2216-2223
[9]   Consumer willingness to pay for food safety interventions: The role of message framing and issue involvement [J].
Britwum, Kofi ;
Yiannaka, Amalia .
FOOD POLICY, 2019, 86
[10]   Shaping food safety perceptions: The influence of informational nudges [J].
Britwum, Kofi ;
Yiannaka, Amalia .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :139-151