The management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and incidence of rupture

被引:0
作者
Von Allmen, R. S. [1 ]
Powell, J. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Charing Cross, Vasc Surg Res Grp, London, England
关键词
Aortic aneurysm; abdominal; Rupture; Diagnosis; Incidence; Prevalence; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR; INCREASING INCIDENCE; RISK-FACTORS; MORTALITY; MEN; SURVEILLANCE; METAANALYSIS; RATES; TERM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Twenty-five years have passed since the first randomised controlled trial began its recruitment for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 and above. Since this and other randomised trials, all launched in the late 80s and 90s of the last century, the epidemiologic profile of abdominal aortic aneurysm may have changed. The trials reported an AAA prevalence in the range of 4-7% for men aged 65 years or more. AAA-related mortality was significantly improved by screening, and after 13 years, the largest trial showed a benefit for all-cause mortality. Screening also was shown to be cost-effective. Today, there are studies showing a substantial decrease of AAA prevalence to sometimes less than 2% in men aged >= 65 years and there is evidence that the incidence of ruptured aneurysm and mortality from AAA is also declining. This decline preceded the implementation of screening programmes but may be due to a change in risk factor management. The prevalence of smoking has decreased and there has been improvement in the control of hypertension and a rising use of statins for cardiovascular risk prevention. Additionally, there is a shift of the burden to the older age group of >= 75 years. Such radical changes may influence screening policy and it is worth reflecting on the optimum age of screening - it might be better to screen at ages >65 years - or rescreening 5 to 10 years after the first screen.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Increasing incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm:: A population-based study [J].
Acosta, Stefan ;
Ogren, Mats ;
Bengtsson, Henrik ;
Bergqvist, David ;
Lindblad, Bengt ;
Zdanowski, Zbigniew .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (02) :237-243
[2]  
Anjum A, 2012, EUR J VASC IN PRESS
[3]  
Anjum A, 2012, BR J SURG IN PRESS
[4]  
Ashton HA, 2007, BRIT J SURG, V94, P696, DOI 10.1002/bjs.5780
[5]   The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Ashton, HA ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Day, NE ;
Kim, LG ;
Marteau, TM ;
Scott, RAP ;
Thomspon, SG ;
Walker, NM .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) :1531-1539
[6]   Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion - Risk factors and time intervals for surveillance [J].
Brady, AR ;
Thompson, SG ;
Fowkes, FGR ;
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Powell, JT .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (01) :16-21
[7]   Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Recommendation statement [J].
Calonge, N ;
Allan, JD ;
Berg, AO ;
Frame, PS ;
Gordis, L ;
Gregory, KD ;
Harris, R ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Loveland-Cherry, C ;
Moyer, VA ;
Ockene, JK ;
Petitti, DB ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Yawn, BP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (03) :198-202
[8]   Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR): Results from a Randomised Trial [J].
Cao, P. ;
De Rango, P. ;
Verzini, F. ;
Parlani, G. ;
Romano, L. ;
Cieri, E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (01) :13-25
[9]   Risk factors for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm - Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based screening studies [J].
Cornuz, J ;
Pinto, CS ;
Tevaearai, H ;
Egger, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 14 (04) :343-349
[10]   Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (Review) [J].
Cosford, P. A. ;
Leng, G. C. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02)