Postinfectious olfactory loss: A retrospective study on 791 patients

被引:83
作者
Cavazzana, Annachiara [1 ,2 ]
Larsson, Maria [2 ]
Muench, Marcus [1 ]
Haehner, Antje [1 ]
Hummel, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Smell & Taste Clin, Dresden, Germany
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, Gosta Ekman Lab, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Postinfectious olfactory loss; recovery; smell disorders; Sniffin' Sticks; FOLLOW-UP; DISORDERS; SMELL; DYSFUNCTION; INFECTIONS; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY; TASTE;
D O I
10.1002/lary.26606
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/HypothesisPostinfectious olfactory loss is among the most common causes of olfactory impairment and has substantial negative impact on patients' quality of life. Recovery rates have been shown to spontaneously improve in most of patients, usually within 2 to 3 years. However, existing studies are limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up. We aimed to assess the prognostic factors for recovery in a large sample of 791 patients with postinfectious olfactory disorders. Study DesignRetrospective cohort. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 791 patients with postinfectious olfactory loss. Olfactory functions were assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test at the first and final visits (mean follow-up = 1.94 years). ResultsSmell test scores improved over time. In particular, patient's age and the odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I) (TDI) score at first visit were significant predictors of the extent of change. The percentage of anosmic and hyposmic patients exhibiting clinically significant improvement was 46% and 35%, respectively. ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence within the postinfectious olfactory loss literature, shedding light on the prognostic factors and showing that recovery of olfactory function is very frequent, even many years after the infection. Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 128:10-15, 2018
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Comparison between Odor Thresholds for Phenyl Ethyl Alcohol and Butanol [J].
Croy, Ilona ;
Lange, Kornelia ;
Krone, Franziska ;
Negoias, Simona ;
Seo, Han-Seok ;
Hummel, Thomas .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2009, 34 (06) :523-527
[2]   Recovery of Olfactory Function in Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction Patients after Acupuncture Treatment [J].
Dai, Qi ;
Pang, Zhihui ;
Yu, Hongmeng .
EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 2016
[3]  
Damm M, 2004, HNO, V52, P112, DOI 10.1007/s00106-003-0877-z
[4]   Olfactory training is helpful in postinfectious olfactory loss: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study [J].
Damm, Michael ;
Pikart, Louisa K. ;
Reimann, Heike ;
Burkert, Silke ;
Goektas, Oender ;
Haxel, Boris ;
Frey, Sabine ;
Charalampakis, Ioannis ;
Beule, Achim ;
Renner, Berthold ;
Hummel, Thomas ;
Huettenbrink, Karl-Bernd .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (04) :826-831
[5]  
DEEMS DA, 1991, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V117, P519
[6]  
DUNCAN HJ, 1995, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V121, P1183
[7]   Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing [J].
Gudziol, Volker ;
Loetsch, Joern ;
Haehner, Antje ;
Zahnert, Thomas ;
Hummel, Thomas .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (10) :1858-1863
[8]   Correlation of olfactory function with changes in the volume of the human olfactory bulb [J].
Haehner, Antje ;
Rodewald, Antje ;
Gerber, Johannes C. ;
Hummel, Thomas .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2008, 134 (06) :621-624
[9]   Local and systemic administration of corticosteroids in the treatment of olfactory loss [J].
Heilmann, S ;
Huettenbrink, KB ;
Hummel, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :29-33
[10]  
HENDRIKS A P J, 1988, Rhinology (Utrecht), V26, P229