Collective punishment depends on collective responsibility and political organization of the target group

被引:18
作者
Pereira, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Berent, Jacques [1 ]
Falomir-Pichastor, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Staerkle, Christian [3 ]
Butera, Fabrizio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Collective responsibility; Collective punishment; Democracy; Expectancy violation; Value; PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY; ENTITATIVITY; JUDGMENTS; NORMS; IDENTIFICATION; OFFENDERS; SANCTIONS; DEMOCRACY; VALUES; BLAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What factors determine the willingness to inflict collective punishment upon a group for a misdeed committed by individual group members? This research investigates the effect of collective responsibility shared among group members and the moderating effect of the group's political organization (democratic vs. nondemocratic). Hypothesizing that moral accountability should be greater for democratic offender groups compared to nondemocratic groups, five experiments showed that the positive effect of collective responsibility on support for collective punishment (Experiment 1) was stronger for democratic groups than for nondemocratic groups (Experiments 2-5).A sixth experiment revealed that the moral and social value ascribed to democracy led to higher expectations towards democratic groups, resulting in negative perceptions of the democratic offender group and ultimately in increased collective punishment. The results are discussed in terms of defense strategies of democratic values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 17
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[32]   Sugaring o'er the devil: Moral superiority and group identification help individuals downplay the implications of ingroup rule-breaking [J].
Iyer, Aarti ;
Jetten, Jolanda ;
Haslam, S. Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 42 (02) :141-149
[33]   THE NATURE OF STEREOTYPES - A COMPARISON AND INTEGRATION OF 3 THEORIES [J].
JUSSIM, L ;
COLEMAN, LM ;
LERCH, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (03) :536-546
[34]  
Kant I., 1952, GREAT BOOKS W WORLD, V42, P397
[35]   When deviant leaders are punished more than non-leaders: The role of deviance severity [J].
Karelaia, Natalia ;
Keck, Steffen .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (05) :783-796
[36]   DEFENDANT-JUROR SIMILARITY AND MOCK JUROR JUDGMENTS [J].
KERR, NL ;
HYMES, RW ;
ANDERSON, AB ;
WEATHERS, JE .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1995, 19 (06) :545-567
[37]   Subjective p Intervals Researchers Underestimate the Variability of p Values Over Replication [J].
Lai, Jerry ;
Fidler, Fiona ;
Cumming, Geoff .
METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2012, 8 (02) :51-62
[38]   A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the columbine high school shootings? [J].
Lickel, B ;
Schmader, T ;
Hamilton, DL .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (02) :194-204
[39]   Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity [J].
Lickel, B ;
Hamilton, DL ;
Wieczorkowska, G ;
Lewis, A ;
Sherman, SJ ;
Uhles, AN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) :223-246
[40]   Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression [J].
Lickel, Brian ;
Miller, Norman ;
Stenstrom, Douglas M. ;
Denson, Thomas F. ;
Schmader, Toni .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 10 (04) :372-390