Collective punishment depends on collective responsibility and political organization of the target group

被引:18
作者
Pereira, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Berent, Jacques [1 ]
Falomir-Pichastor, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Staerkle, Christian [3 ]
Butera, Fabrizio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Collective responsibility; Collective punishment; Democracy; Expectancy violation; Value; PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY; ENTITATIVITY; JUDGMENTS; NORMS; IDENTIFICATION; OFFENDERS; SANCTIONS; DEMOCRACY; VALUES; BLAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What factors determine the willingness to inflict collective punishment upon a group for a misdeed committed by individual group members? This research investigates the effect of collective responsibility shared among group members and the moderating effect of the group's political organization (democratic vs. nondemocratic). Hypothesizing that moral accountability should be greater for democratic offender groups compared to nondemocratic groups, five experiments showed that the positive effect of collective responsibility on support for collective punishment (Experiment 1) was stronger for democratic groups than for nondemocratic groups (Experiments 2-5).A sixth experiment revealed that the moral and social value ascribed to democracy led to higher expectations towards democratic groups, resulting in negative perceptions of the democratic offender group and ultimately in increased collective punishment. The results are discussed in terms of defense strategies of democratic values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 17
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   When the Association Between Appearance and Outcome Contaminates Social Judgment: A Bidirectional Model Linking Group Homogeneity and Collective Treatment [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Darley, John M. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (05) :776-795
[2]  
[Anonymous], THE MORAL JUDGMENT O
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1949, 1949 CONVENTIONS ADD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, STAT METHODS METAANA
[5]  
Biernat M, 1999, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P523, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<523::AID-EJSP944>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-J
[7]  
Bin Laden O., 2002, FULL TEXT BIN LADENS
[8]   On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions [J].
Carlsmith, Kevin M. .
SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2008, 21 (02) :119-137
[9]  
Carlsmith KM, 2002, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V83, P284, DOI [10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284, 10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.284]
[10]  
Cohen R.L., 1991, Social Justice in Human Relations, Vol 1: Societal and Psychological Origins of Justice, eds, P239