Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off? Not So Fast: Marginal Changes in Speed Have Inconsistent Relationships With Accuracy in Real-World Settings

被引:15
作者
Domingue, Benjamin W. [1 ]
Kanopka, Klint [1 ]
Stenhaug, Ben [1 ]
Sulik, Michael J. [1 ]
Beverly, Tanesia [2 ,3 ]
Brinkhuis, Matthieu [4 ]
Circi, Ruhan [5 ]
Faul, Jessica [6 ]
Liao, Dandan [7 ]
McCandliss, Bruce [1 ]
Obradovic, Jelena [1 ]
Piech, Chris [8 ]
Porter, Tenelle [9 ]
Soland, James [11 ]
Weeks, Jon [12 ]
Wise, Steven L. [13 ]
Yeatman, Jason [1 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
[3] Law Sch Admiss Council, Newtown, PA USA
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Amer Inst Res, Arlington, VA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Cambium Assessment Inc, Washington, DC USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[9] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[11] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[12] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[13] NWEA, Portland, OR USA
[14] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
response time; IRT; speed-accuracy trade-off; conditional accuracy function; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MODEL; TIMES; PACKAGE; AGE;
D O I
10.3102/10769986221099906
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) suggests that time constraints reduce response accuracy. Its relevance in observational settings-where response time (RT) may not be constrained but respondent speed may still vary-is unclear. Using 29 data sets containing data from cognitive tasks, we use a flexible method for identification of the SAT (which we test in extensive simulation studies) to probe whether the SAT holds. We find inconsistent relationships between time and accuracy; marginal increases in time use for an individual do not necessarily predict increases in accuracy. Additionally, the speed-accuracy relationship may depend on the underlying difficulty of the interaction. We also consider the analysis of items and individuals; of particular interest is the observation that respondents who exhibit more within-person variation in response speed are typically of lower ability. We further find that RT is typically a weak predictor of response accuracy. Our findings document a range of empirical phenomena that should inform future modeling of RTs collected in observational settings.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 602
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Berge L., 2018, CREA DISCUSS PAP, V13
[2]   Modeling Nonlinear Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy [J].
Bolsinova, Maria ;
Molenaar, Dylan .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
[3]  
Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
[4]   Curvilinear dependency of response accuracy on response time in cognitive tests [J].
Chen, Haiqin ;
De Boeck, Paul ;
Grady, Matthew ;
Yang, Chien-Lin ;
Waldschmidt, David .
INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 69 :16-23
[5]   A modified least-squares regression approach to the estimation of risk difference [J].
Cheung, Yin Bun .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 166 (11) :1337-1344
[6]   Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching [J].
Davidson, Matthew C. ;
Amso, Dima ;
Cruess Anderson, Loren ;
Diamond, Adele .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (11) :2037-2078
[7]   An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests [J].
De Boeck, Paul ;
Jeon, Minjeong .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[8]  
De Boeck P, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V39, P1
[9]   Modeling Item-Position Effects Within an IRT Framework [J].
Debeer, Dries ;
Janssen, Rianne .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 50 (02) :164-185
[10]   The speed-error trade-off problem in psychometric testing [J].
Dennis, I ;
Evans, JST .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 87 :105-129