Connectivity of the Cognitive Control Network During Response Inhibition as a Predictive and Response Biomarker in Major Depression: Evidence From a Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:62
作者
Tozzi, Leonardo [1 ]
Goldstein-Piekarski, Andrea N. [1 ,4 ]
Korgaonkar, Mayuresh S. [2 ,3 ]
Williams, Leanne M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Brain Dynam Ctr, Westmead Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Western Clin Sch, Discipline Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Palo Alto, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Biomarker; Cognitive control; fMRI; Go-NoGo; Major depressive disorder; Treatment; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; DISORDER; METAANALYSIS; ABNORMALITIES; IMPAIRMENTS; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In treating major depressive disorder, we lack tests anchored in neurobiology that predict antidepressant efficacy. Cognitive impairments are a particularly disabling feature of major depressive disorder. We tested whether functional connectivity during a response-inhibition task can predict response to antidepressants and whether its changes over time are correlated to symptom changes. METHODS: We analyzed data from outpatients with major depressive disorder (n = 124) randomized to receive escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine (8 weeks) and healthy control subjects (n = 59; age 18-65 years). Before and after treatment, participants were interviewed and scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging, and functional connectivity was measured using generalized psychophysiological interaction during response inhibition (Go-NoGo task). We investigated the interaction between treatment type and response (>= 50% reduction on self-reported symptoms), coupling differences between responders and nonresponders at baseline, their correlation with symptom improvement, and their changes in time. RESULTS: During response inhibition, connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex/supramarginal gyrus and supramarginal gyrus/middle temporal gyrus was associated with response to sertraline and venlafaxine, but not escitalopram. Sertraline responders had higher functional connectivity between these regions compared with nonresponders, whereas venlafaxine responders had lower functional connectivity. For sertraline, attenuation of connectivity in the precentral and superior temporal gyri correlated with posttreatment symptom improvement. For venlafaxine, enhancement of connectivity between the orbitofrontal cortex and subcortical regions correlated with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Connectivity of the cognitive control circuit during response inhibition selectively and differentially predicts antidepressant treatment response and correlates with symptom improvement. These quantitative markers tied to the neurobiology of cognitive features of depression could be used translationally to predict and evaluate treatment response.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 472
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Gray matter abnormalities in Major Depressive Disorder: A meta-analysis of voxel based morphometry studies [J].
Bora, Emre ;
Fornito, Alex ;
Pantelis, Christos ;
Yuecel, Murat .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 138 (1-2) :9-18
[2]   Topological FDR for neuroimaging [J].
Chumbley, J. ;
Worsley, K. ;
Flandin, G. ;
Friston, K. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 49 (04) :3057-3064
[3]   Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Furukawa, Tashi A. ;
Salanti, Georgia ;
Chaimani, Anna ;
Atkinson, Lavren Z. ;
Ogawa, Yusuke ;
Levcht, Stefan ;
Ruhe, Henricus G. ;
Turner, Erick H. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Takeshima, Nozomi ;
Hayasaka, Yu ;
Imai, Hissei ;
Shinohara, Kiyomi ;
Tajika, Aran ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Geddes, Jahn R. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10128) :1357-1366
[4]   Multidimensional prediction of treatment response to antidepressants with cognitive control and functional MRI [J].
Crane, Natania A. ;
Jenkins, Lisanne M. ;
Bhaumik, Runa ;
Dion, Catherine ;
Gowins, Jennifer R. ;
Mickey, Brian J. ;
Zubieta, Jon-Kar ;
Langenecker, Scott A. .
BRAIN, 2017, 140 (02) :472-486
[5]   A network approach to response inhibition: dissociating functional connectivity of neural components involved in action restraint and action cancellation [J].
Dambacher, Franziska ;
Sack, Alexander T. ;
Lobbestael, Jill ;
Arntz, Arnoud ;
Brugman, Suzanne ;
Schuhmann, Teresa .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 39 (05) :821-831
[6]   Cognitive and emotional biomarkers of melancholic depression: An iSPOT-D report [J].
Day, Claire V. ;
Gatt, Justine M. ;
Etkin, Amit ;
DeBattista, Charles ;
Schatzberg, Alan F. ;
Williams, Leanne M. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 176 :141-150
[7]  
Delgado PL, 2000, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V61, P5
[8]   Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression [J].
Disner, Seth G. ;
Beevers, Christopher G. ;
Haigh, Emily A. P. ;
Beck, Aaron T. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 12 (08) :467-477
[9]   Brain structural and functional abnormalities in mood disorders: implications for neurocircuitry models of depression [J].
Drevets, Wayne C. ;
Price, Joseph L. ;
Furey, Maura L. .
BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2008, 213 (1-2) :93-118
[10]  
Friedrich M J, 2017, JAMA, V317, P1517, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.3826