Sticky apps, not sticky hands: A systematic review and content synthesis of hand hygiene mobile apps

被引:17
作者
Gasteiger, Norina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dowding, Dawn [1 ]
Ali, Syed Mustafa [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Scott, Ashley Jordan Stephen [1 ,6 ]
Wilson, Paul [3 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Div Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Ctr Hlth Informat, Div Informat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Ctr Epidemiol Versus Arthrit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Div Nursing & Midwifery, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
smartphone; mobile health; review; hand hygiene; hand washing; infectious diseases; INTERVENTIONS; GUIDELINES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocab094
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: The study sought to identify smartphone apps that support hand hygiene practice and to assess their content, technical and functional features, and quality. A secondary objective was to make design and research recommendations for future apps. Materials and Methods: We searched the UK Google Play and Apple App stores for hand hygiene smartphone apps aimed at adults. Information regarding content, technical and functional features was extracted and summarized. Two raters evaluated each app, using the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics functionality score and the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Results: A total of 668 apps were identified, with 90 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most (96%) were free to download. The majority (78%) intended to educate or inform or remind users to hand wash (69%), using behavior change techniques such as personalization and prompting practice. Only 20% and 4% named a best practice guideline or had expert involvement in development, respectively. Innovative means of engagement were used in 42% (eg, virtual or augmented reality or geolocation-based reminders). Apps included an average of 2.4 out of 10 of the IMS functionality criteria (range, 0-8). The mean MARS score was 3.2 +/- 0.5 out of 5, and 68% had a minimum acceptability score of 3. Two had been tested or trialed. Conclusions: Although many hand hygiene apps exist, few provide content on best practice. Many did not meet the minimum acceptability criterion for quality or were formally trialed or tested. Research should assess the feasibility and effectiveness of hand hygiene apps (especially within healthcare settings), including when and how they "work." We recommend that future apps to support hand hygiene practice are developed with infection prevention and control experts and align with best practice. Robust research is needed to determine which innovative methods of engagement create "sticky" apps.
引用
收藏
页码:2027 / 2038
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions
    Abraham, Charles
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (03) : 379 - 387
  • [2] Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: A systematic review of mobile apps
    Ali, Syed Mustafa
    Lau, Wei J.
    McBeth, John
    Dixon, William G.
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 25 (02) : 327 - 338
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, HAND HYG WHY WHEN
  • [4] Baggio E, 2020, REV GAUCHA ENFERM, V41
  • [5] A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management
    Bardus, Marco
    van Beurden, Samantha B.
    Smith, Jane R.
    Abraham, Charles
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2016, 13
  • [6] Healthcare workers' perceptions and acceptance of an electronic reminder system for hand hygiene
    Blomgren, P-O
    Lytsy, B.
    Hjelm, K.
    Swenne, C. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2021, 108 : 197 - 204
  • [7] Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
    Bondaronek, Paulina
    Alkhaldi, Ghadah
    Slee, April
    Hamilton, Fiona L.
    Murray, Elizabeth
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (03):
  • [8] Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement
    Cabana, MD
    Rand, CS
    Powe, NR
    Wu, AW
    Wilson, MH
    Abboud, PAC
    Rubin, HR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15): : 1458 - 1465
  • [9] Assessment of Real-World Use of Behavioral Health Mobile Applications by a Novel Stickiness Metric
    Carlo, Andrew D.
    Ghomi, Reza Hosseini
    Renn, Brenna N.
    Strong, Michael A.
    Arean, Patricia A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (08) : E2011978
  • [10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, CONSTRUCT YOUR INTEL