Estimated cost of universal public coverage of prescription drugs in Canada

被引:62
作者
Morgan, Steven G. [1 ]
Law, Michael [2 ]
Daw, Jamie R. [3 ]
Abraham, Liza [4 ]
Martin, Danielle [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Harvard Univ, Harvard PhD Program Hlth Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
OLDER-PEOPLE; INSURANCE; OUTCOMES; ADHERENCE; SYSTEMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.141564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With the exception of Canada, all countries with universal health insurance systems provide universal coverage of prescription drugs. Progress toward universal public drug coverage in Canada has been slow, in part because of concerns about the potential costs. We sought to estimate the cost of implementing universal public coverage of prescription drugs in Canada. Methods: We used published data on prescribing patterns and costs by drug type, as well as source of funding (i.e., private drug plans, public drug plans and out-of-pocket expenses), in each province to estimate the cost of universal public coverage of prescription drugs from the perspectives of government, private payers and society as a whole. We estimated the cost of universal public drug coverage based on its anticipated effects on the volume of prescriptions filled, products selected and prices paid. We selected these parameters based on current policies and practices seen either in a Canadian province or in an international - comparator. Results: Universal public drug coverage would reduce total spending on prescription drugs in Canada by $7.3 billion (worst-case scenario $4.2 billion, best-case scenario $9.4 billion). The private sector would save $8.2 billion (worst-case scenario $6.6 billion, best-case scenario $9.6 billion), whereas costs to government would increase by about $1.0 billion (worst-case scenario $5.4 billion net increase, best-case scenario $2.9 billion net savings). Most of the projected increase in government costs would arise from a small number of drug classes. Interpretation: The long-term barrier to the implementation of universal pharmacare owing to its perceived costs appears to be unjustified. Universal public drug coverage would likely yield substantial savings to the private sector with comparatively little increase in costs to government.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 497
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Pharmaceutical policies:: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies [J].
Aaserud, M. ;
Dahlgren, A. T. ;
Kosters, J. P. ;
Oxman, A. D. ;
Ramsay, C. ;
Sturm, H. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Canadian Rx Atlas
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NAT PHARM COST IMP S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COST IMP STUD NAT PH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ENS ACC AFF SUST PRE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NAT HLTH EXP TRENDS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STRUCT AN STAN DAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SOURC SYMB STAT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GEN DRUGS CAN 2013
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PAT MED PRIC REV BOA