Treatment preferences among adults with normal cognition and cognitive impairment

被引:3
|
作者
Owsley, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Langa, Kenneth M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Macis, Mario [5 ,6 ]
Nicholas, Lauren Hersch [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Carey Business Sch, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Syst Management & Policy, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
aging; cognitive impairment; dementia; observational study; treatment preference; DECISION-MAKING CAPACITY; LIFE TREATMENT PREFERENCES; CHINESE OLDER PERSONS; DEMENTIA; CARE; DISEASE; HEALTH; DEMOGRAPHICS; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.18032
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Although patient participation in treatment decisions is important for preference-concordant care delivery, it is largely unknown how cognitive impairment influences treatment preferences. We investigated whether treatment preferences for the care of serious illness differ between adults with and without cognitive impairment in hypothetical clinical scenarios. Methods Data from the 2018 Health and Retirement Study were used. The sample included 1291 self-respondents (201 respondents with cognitive impairment, and 1090 with normal cognition). We examined treatment preferences for life-extending, limited, and comfort care options in two hypothetical clinical scenarios where the respondent imagines a patient with (1) good physical health with severe cognitive impairment consistent with dementia; and (2) with physical impairment due to a heart attack, but normal cognition. Respondents specified whether they were unsure, or if they would want or not want each treatment option. Linear probability models were used to compare treatment preferences by cognitive status. Results Respondents with cognitive impairment were more likely to report that they were unsure about treatment options across both clinical scenarios compared to those with normal cognition. For the limited treatment option, cognitive impairment was associated with a lower rate of expressing a treatment preference by 7.3 (p = 0.070) and 8.5 (p = 0.035) percentage points for dementia and heart attack scenarios, respectively. Among those who articulated preferences, cognitive impairment was associated with a higher rate of preference for life-extending treatment in both dementia (30.1% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.044) and heart attack scenarios (30.0% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.033). Conclusions Compared to those with normal cognition, cognitive impairment was associated with greater uncertainty about treatment preferences and higher rates of aggressive care preferences among those who specified preferences. Further research should assess whether preferences for aggressive care become more common as cognition declines in order to improve preference-concordant care delivery for patients with cognitive impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:3390 / 3401
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Association Between Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis and Patient Treatment Preferences: a Survey of Older Adults
    Levine, Deborah A.
    Galecki, Andrzej T.
    Plassman, Brenda L.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Langa, Kenneth M.
    Whitney, Rachael T.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Morgenstern, Lewis B.
    Reale, Bailey K.
    Blair, Emilie M.
    Giordani, Bruno
    Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen Anne
    Kabeto, Mohammed U.
    Zahuranec, Darin B.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (08) : 1925 - 1934
  • [2] Early markers of kidney dysfunction and cognitive impairment among older adults
    Wei, Yudan
    Wei, Yinan Kevin
    Zhu, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 375 : 209 - 214
  • [3] Predictive value of olfactory impairment for cognitive decline among cognitively normal adults
    Windon, Melina J.
    Kim, Sun Joo
    Oh, Esther S.
    Lin, Sandra Y.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (04) : 840 - 847
  • [4] Dispositional Optimism and Incidence of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults
    Gawronski, Katerina A. B.
    Kim, Eric S.
    Langa, Kenneth M.
    Kubzansky, Laura D.
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2016, 78 (07): : 819 - 828
  • [5] The Influence of Cognitive Impairment on Health Behaviors among Older Adults
    Kang, Sung-wan
    Xiang, Xiaoling
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2020, 44 (02): : 159 - 168
  • [6] Factors associated with cognition recovery among elders with mild cognitive impairment in Korea
    Kang, Y.
    Kim, M.
    Jung, D.
    Cha, C.
    Kim, M.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2014, 61 (03) : 318 - 326
  • [7] Factors Associated with Cognitive Impairment Among Indonesian Older Adults
    Erlianti, Chintya Putri
    Trihandini, Indang
    AGING MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE, 2024, 15 (03): : 105 - 113
  • [8] A Scoping Review for Usage of Telerehabilitation among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Cognitive Frailty
    Fadzil, Nurul Hidayah Md
    Shahar, Suzana
    Rajikan, Roslee
    Singh, Devinder Kaur Ajit
    Ludin, Arimi Fitri Mat
    Subramaniam, Ponnusamy
    Ibrahim, Norhayati
    Vanoh, Divya
    Ali, Nazlena Mohamad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [9] Mild cognitive impairment and receipt of procedures for acute ischemic stroke in older adults
    Levine, Deborah A.
    Galecki, Andrzej
    Kabeto, Mohammed
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Zahuranec, Darin B.
    Morgenstern, Lewis B.
    Lisabeth, Lynda D.
    Giordani, Bruno
    Langa, Kenneth M.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (10)
  • [10] Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults with Heart Failure
    Gure, Tanya R.
    Blaum, Caroline S.
    Giordani, Bruno
    Koelling, Todd M.
    Galecki, Andrzej
    Pressler, Susan J.
    Hummel, Scott L.
    Langa, Kenneth M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (09) : 1724 - 1729