High dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels

被引:25
|
作者
Kanfer, EJ
McGuigan, D
Samson, D
Abboudi, Z
Abrahamson, G
Apperley, JF
Chilcott, S
Craddock, C
Davis, J
MacDonald, C
Macdonald, D
Olavarria, E
Philpott, N
Rustin, GJS
Seckl, MJ
Sekhar, M
Stern, S
Newlands, ES
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Haematol, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hosp,Sch Med, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Med Oncol, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hosp,Sch Med, London W12 0NN, England
关键词
etoposide; progenitor cell; mobilization;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1998.603
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34(+) cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34(+) cells kg(-1), Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield, Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 932
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mobilization efficiency of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor to bone marrow mononuclear cells and mechanisms
    Duan, Deyu
    Xiao, Baojun
    Yang, Shuhua
    Shao, Zengwu
    Wang, Hong
    Guo, Xiaodong
    Liu, Yong
    Ye, Zhewei
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 30 (04) : 477 - 481
  • [32] Mobilization Efficiency of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor and Stem Cell Factor to Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells and Mechanisms
    段德宇
    肖宝钧
    杨述华
    邵增务
    王洪
    郭晓东
    刘勇
    叶哲伟
    Current Medical Science, 2010, (04) : 477 - 481
  • [33] Mobilization efficiency of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor to bone marrow mononuclear cells and mechanisms
    Deyu Duan
    Baojun Xiao
    Shuhua Yang
    Zengwu Shao
    Hong Wang
    Xiaodong Guo
    Yong Liu
    Zhewei Ye
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2010, 30 : 477 - 481
  • [34] Synergistic effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells with long-term repopulating ability into peripheral blood in mice
    K Honda
    K Takenaka
    K Shinagawa
    F Ishimaru
    K Ikeda
    K Niiya
    M Harada
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2001, 28 : 329 - 334
  • [35] Double apheresis of peripheral blood stem cells in a single day in children mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for transplantation
    Okamoto, Yasuhiro
    Watanabe, Tsutomu
    Watanabe, Hiroyoshi
    Onishi, Toshihiro
    Kawano, Yoshifumi
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 13 (04) : 440 - 443
  • [36] Synergistic effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells with long-term repopulating ability into peripheral blood in mice
    Honda, K
    Takenaka, K
    Shinagawa, K
    Ishimaru, F
    Ikeda, K
    Niiya, K
    Harada, M
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 28 (04) : 329 - 334
  • [37] Enhancement of the anti-tumor activity of a peripheral blood progenitor cell graft by mobilization with interleukin 2 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced breast cancer
    Burns, LJ
    Weisdorf, DJ
    DeFor, TE
    Repka, TL
    Ogle, KM
    Hummer, C
    Miller, JS
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 2000, 28 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [38] The "G-CSF test": The response to a single dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor predicts mobilization of hemopoietic progenitors in patients with hematologic malignancies
    Mijovic, A
    Pagliuca, A
    Mufti, GJ
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1999, 27 (07) : 1204 - 1209
  • [39] Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with cancer using plerixafor (Mozobil™) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
    Avramova, Boryana E.
    Yordanova, Maya N.
    Konstantinov, Dobrin N.
    Bobev, Dragan G.
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2011, 5 : 407 - 409
  • [40] Continuous drip infusion of low dose cytarabine and etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy
    Kanemura, Nobuhiro
    Tsurumi, Hisashi
    Kasahara, Senji
    Hara, Takeshi
    Yamada, Toshiki
    Sawada, Michio
    Goto, Naoe
    Kitagawa, Jun-ichi
    Shimizu, Masahito
    Oyama, Masami
    Moriwaki, Hisataka
    HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (01) : 33 - 38