Ethical Bearing Is About Our Conduct: Ethics as an Essential Component of Military Interprofessional Healthcare Teams

被引:8
作者
Meyer, Holly S. [1 ]
Bader-Larsen, Karlen S. [1 ,2 ]
Artino, Anthony [1 ,3 ]
Varpio, Lara [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Henry M Jackson Fdn Adv Mil Med Inc, 6720A Rockledge Dr, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Human Funct & Rehabil Sci, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC 20037 USA
关键词
MEDICAL-ETHICS; DUAL AGENCY; CLINICIAN;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usab197
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The need to maintain medical ethical standards during conflict and peace has been the source of considerable academic discourse. Although still an unsolved challenge, scholars have made significant contributions to the literature, constructing categorizations that can help military providers contend with ethical conflicts. However, insights into the ethical comportment of military interprofessional healthcare teams (MIHTs) have yet to be reported. Materials and Methods: This interview-based study collected insights from 30 military healthcare providers who participated in and/or led MIHTs. Altogether, participants represented 11 health professions, both officers and enlisted military members, and the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Force. Following Grounded Theory methodology, data were collected and analyzed in iterative cycles until theme saturation was reached. Results: The research team identified two themes of ethical bearing that enable MIHT success in and across care contexts. One theme of successful ethical bearing is "raising concerns," referring to speaking up when something needs to be addressed. The other is "making compromises," where individuals have to make sacrifices (e.g., lack of equipment, non-sterile environment, etc.) to give patient care. Conclusions: These data suggest that effective MIHTs have a collective moral compass. This moral compass is the team's ability to judge what is ethically right and wrong, as well as the team's willingness and ability to act accordingly-to consistently "do the right thing." There is a collective moral compass, and while the team may not all agree on what exactly is true north-they are all bending that way.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Advancing Medical Professionalism in US Military Detainee Treatment [J].
Rubenstein, Leonard S. ;
Allen, Scott A. ;
Guze, Phyllis A. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (01)
[22]  
Sidel V W., 2003, Military Medical Ethics, V1, P293
[23]   Dual agency for VA clinicians: Defining an evolving ethical question [J].
Stone, Andrew M. .
MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 20 (01) :37-48
[24]  
STRUTZEL E, 1968, NURS RES, V17, P364
[25]   Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups [J].
Tong, Allison ;
Sainsbury, Peter ;
Craig, Jonathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (06) :349-357
[26]  
U.S. Department of Defense, 2012, REP C REV LAND POL R
[27]  
UN OCHA, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
[28]  
World Medical Association [WMA], 2012, 63 WMA GEN ASS BANGK