Social Work, Risk, Power

被引:4
作者
Smith, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] De Montfort Univ, Leicester, Leics, England
来源
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE | 2010年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Social Work; Risk; Power; Social Justice; Authority; Legitimacy Left_arrows;
D O I
10.5153/sro.2101
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Contemporary ideas and strategies of both 'risk' and 'power' are significant and dynamic influences in social theory and social action, and they can therefore be expected to have a substantial impact on the ways in which social work is constituted, practiced and evaluated. In this article, I shall articulate distinct conceptualisations and debates about each of these, before considering their inter-relationships and the implications of these for our thinking about what social work is, and what it should be. Firstly, I will consider social work's contested and problematic place within the broader welfare domain. It is recognised as being a form of activity which inhabits an ambiguous and uncertain position at the interface between the individual and the social, and between the marginalised and the mainstream. Building on this, 'power' will be shown to infuse social work ideas and practices in a number of distinct dimensions, linking and bridging 'personal', 'positional' and 'relational' domains. This discussion will be juxtaposed with a discussion of 'risk' and the part it has come to play in shaping and infusing social work practices, especially but not exclusively with children. The deconstruction of contemporary understandings and uses of risk as a central and 'authoritative' feature of assessment and decision-making will inform the argument that it can be viewed as a vehicle for the maintenance and legitimation of power relations which disenfranchise and oppress those who are most vulnerable. In conclusion, I will summarise the ways in which conventional understandings and inter-related material realities of power and risk are often hierarchical, uni-directional and oppressive; and on this basis, how they can be laid open to challenge. The reconceptualisation and remaking of power relations will be shown to have direct consequences for the ways in which risk is defined and addressed as a social work 'problem'.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DIFFERENTIATION OF FORCE AND POWER IN LITHUANIAN SOCIAL WORK
    Jurkuviene, Ramune
    Gajdosikiene, Indre
    Jokubauske, Sandra
    SOCIALINE TEORIJA EMPIRIJA POLITIKA IR PRAKTIKA, 2015, (10): : 7 - 20
  • [22] Social work and risk society: the need for shared social responsibility
    Saenz de Ugarte, Loreto
    Martin-Aranaga, Idoia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2011, 14 (04) : 447 - 462
  • [23] Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Social Work
    Abisheva, Kuralay
    Assylbekova, Leila
    WLC 2016: WORLD LUMEN CONGRESS. LOGOS UNIVERSALITY MENTALITY EDUCATION NOVELTY 2016 (LUMEN 15TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION), 2016, 15 : 5 - 15
  • [24] Is the Centrality of Relationship in Social Work at Risk with IVT?
    Smith, Priscilla R.
    Wingerson, Nikki W.
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES, 2006, 24 (2-3) : 23 - 37
  • [25] Delivering Diversity and Social Justice in Social Work Education: The Power of Context
    Deepak, Anne
    Rountree, Michele
    Scott, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF PROGRESSIVE HUMAN SERVICES, 2015, 26 (02) : 107 - 125
  • [26] Work, power and learning in a risk filled occupation
    Collin, Kaija
    Sintonen, Teppo
    Paloniemi, Susanna
    Auvinen, Tommi
    MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2011, 42 (03) : 301 - 318
  • [27] 'Speaking Back' to Fear: Responding to the Moral Dilemmas of Risk in Social Work Practice
    Stanford, Sonya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2010, 40 (04) : 1065 - 1080
  • [29] SOCIAL REPRESENTATION OF RISK AT WORK BY STUDENTS OF THE COURSE WORK SAFETY TECHNICIAN
    Navega Chagas, Eliane Ayrolla
    Pereira Lima, Rita de Cassia
    REVISTA DE CIENCIAS HUMANAS DA UNIVERSIDADE DE TAUBATE, 2018, 11 (02): : 47 - 61
  • [30] Social work, class politics and risk in the moral panic over Baby P
    Warner, Joanne
    HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2013, 15 (03) : 217 - 233