Learning across Communities of Practice: An Examination of Multidisciplinary Work

被引:63
作者
Oborn, Eivor [1 ]
Dawson, Sandra
机构
[1] Royal Holloway Univ London, Sch Management, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
关键词
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; POWER; STRATEGIES; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00684.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as important sites of learning. Novices learn from masters whilst participating in situated practice and becoming more central members of the community. Empirical studies highlight the difficulty of learning across CoPs, although few studies specifically examine how learning develops in such a multidisciplinary context. We examine the processes of learning occurring when members of different CoPs, in this case various cancer specialists, are required to meet together as a formally constituted multidisciplinary team, and to establish multidisciplinary collaboration as a basis for decision making and action. Our paper highlights that while learning in CoPs develops through repetition, gaining legitimacy and achieving mastery, learning across CoPs in multidisciplinary contexts emphasizes key boundary processes to negotiate and broaden meaning. As such, multidisciplinary collaboration is not so much to learn from each others' talk, but to learn to talk in this new arena. We identify three practices which facilitate learning across CoPs: organizing discussions, acknowledging other perspectives and challenging assumptions. We also discuss the boundary processes which are promoted through brokers and the use of boundary objects in facilitating multidisciplinary work.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 858
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries [J].
Scarbrough, H ;
Swan, J ;
Laurent, S ;
Bresnen, M ;
Edelman, L ;
Newell, S .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (09) :1579-1600
[32]  
Schon D.A, 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
[33]  
Strauss A., 1998, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
[34]   Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy [J].
Suddaby, R ;
Greenwood, R .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 50 (01) :35-67
[35]   The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups [J].
Tagliaventi, MR ;
Mattarelli, E .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2006, 59 (03) :291-319
[36]   Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice [J].
Thompson, M .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (02) :151-164
[37]  
Van der Vegt GS, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P532, DOI 10.2307/20159674
[38]   Communities of practice and social learning systems [J].
Wenger, E .
ORGANIZATION, 2000, 7 (02) :225-246
[39]  
Wenger E., 1998, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE, DOI 10.2277/0521663636
[40]  
Yanow D, 2004, BRIT J MANAGE, V15, pS9