Using DNA metabarcoding to assess New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity

被引:28
作者
Holdaway, Robert J. [1 ]
Wood, Jamie R. [1 ]
Dickie, Ian A. [2 ]
Orwin, Kate H. [1 ]
Bellingham, Peter. J. [1 ]
Richardson, Sarah J. [1 ]
Lyver, Phil O'B. [1 ]
Timoti, Puke [3 ]
Buckley, Thomas R. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
[2] Lincoln Univ, Bioprotect Res Ctr, POB 85084, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
[3] Tuhoe Tuawhenua Trust, Private Bag 3001, Ruatahuna, New Zealand
[4] Landcare Res, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Sch Biol Sci, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
来源
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY | 2017年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
biodiversity monitoring; bioinformatics; biosecurity; cultural indicators; ecosystem function; environmental DNA; national framework; species detection; te ao Maori; uncertainty; SOIL FOOD-WEB; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; ANCIENT DNA; CONSERVATION; DIVERSITY; IDENTIFICATION; SEQUENCES; ACCURACY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.20417/nzjecol.41.28
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
High throughput DNA sequencing technology has enabled entire biological communities to be characterised from DNA derived from pools of organisms, such as bulk-collected invertebrates, or DNA extracted from environmental samples (e.g. soil). These DNA-based techniques have the potential to revolutionise biodiversity monitoring. One approach in particular, DNA metabarcoding, can provide unprecedented taxonomic breadth at a scale not practically achievable through the morphological identification of individual organisms. Here, we assess the current strengths and weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding techniques for biodiversity assessment. We argue that it is essential to integrate conventional monitoring methods with novel DNA methods, to validate methods, and to better use and interpret data. We present a conceptual framework for how this might be done, explore potential applications within national biodiversity assessment frameworks, Maori biodiversity monitoring and the primary sector, and highlight areas of current uncertainty and future research directions. Rapid developments in DNA sequencing technology and bioinformatics will make DNA-based community data increasingly accessible to ecologists, and there needs to be a corresponding shift in research focus from DNA metabarcoding method development and evaluation to real-world applications that provide rich infornhation for a range of purposes, including conservation planning and land management decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 262
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring in a national park: Screening for invasive and pest species
    Hardulak, Laura A.
    Moriniere, Jerome
    Hausmann, Axel
    Hendrich, Lars
    Schmidt, Stefan
    Doczkal, Dieter
    Mueller, Joerg
    Hebert, Paul D. N.
    Haszprunar, Gerhard
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2020, 20 (06) : 1542 - 1557
  • [42] Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals the effects of seafloor litter and trawling on marine biodiversity
    Sbrana, Alice
    Maiello, Giulia
    Gravina, Maria Flavia
    Cicala, Davide
    Galli, Simone
    Stefani, Matteo
    Russo, Tommaso
    [J]. MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 196
  • [43] High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics?
    Wilson, John-James
    Brandon-Mong, Guo-Jie
    Gan, Han-Ming
    Sing, Kong-Wah
    [J]. MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART A, 2019, 30 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [44] New deep learning-based methods for visualizing ecosystem properties using environmental DNA metabarcoding data
    Lamperti, Letizia
    Sanchez, Theophile
    Moussi, Sara Si
    Mouillot, David
    Albouy, Camille
    Fluck, Benjamin
    Bruno, Morgane
    Valentini, Alice
    Pellissier, Loic
    Manel, Stephanie
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2023, 23 (08) : 1946 - 1958
  • [45] Monitoring vertebrate biodiversity of a protected coastal wetland using eDNA metabarcoding
    Saenz-Agudelo, Pablo
    Delrieu-Trottin, Erwan
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Martinez-Rincon, Diego
    Morales-Gonzalez, Sarai
    Pontigo, Felipe
    Ramirez, Paula
    Silva, Andrea
    Soto, Mauricio
    Correa, Cristian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2022, 4 (01): : 77 - 92
  • [46] Abundance estimation with DNA metabarcoding - recent advancements for terrestrial arthropods
    Sickel, Wiebke
    Zizka, Vera
    Scherges, Alice
    Bourlat, Sarah J.
    Dieker, Petra
    [J]. METABARCODING AND METAGENOMICS, 2023, 7 : 305 - 337
  • [47] Marine Vertebrate Biodiversity and Distribution Within the Central California Current Using Environmental DNA (eDNA) Metabarcoding and Ecosystem Surveys
    Closek, Collin J.
    Santora, Jarrod A.
    Starks, Hilary A.
    Schroeder, Isaac D.
    Andruszkiewicz, Elizabeth A.
    Sakuma, Keith M.
    Bograd, Steven J.
    Hazenv, Elliott L.
    Field, John C.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [48] Spatio-temporal monitoring of deep-sea communities using metabarcoding of sediment DNA and RNA
    Guardiola, Magdalena
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Coissac, Eric
    Jesus Uriz, Maria
    Turon, Xavier
    [J]. PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [49] Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder
    Suter, Leonie
    Polanowski, Andrea Maree
    Clarke, Laurence John
    Kitchener, John Andrew
    Deagle, Bruce Emerson
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2021, 30 (13) : 3140 - 3157
  • [50] Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
    Grey, Erin K.
    Bernatchez, Louis
    Cassey, Phillip
    Deiner, Kristy
    Deveney, Marty
    Howland, Kimberley L.
    Lacoursiere-Roussel, Anais
    Leong, Sandric Chee Yew
    Li, Yiyuan
    Olds, Brett
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    Prowse, Thomas A. A.
    Renshaw, Mark A.
    Lodge, David M.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8