Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature

被引:59
作者
Huang, Yinan [1 ]
Talwar, Ashna [1 ]
Chatterjee, Satabdi [1 ]
Aparasu, Rajender R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Outcomes & Policy, Coll Pharm, 4849 Calhoun Rd,Hlth & Sci Bldg 2, Houston, TX 77204 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Hospital readmission; Scoping review; Prediction; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEART-FAILURE; 30-DAY READMISSIONS; RISK; ALGORITHMS; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES; FUSION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-021-01284-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Advances in machine learning (ML) provide great opportunities in the prediction of hospital readmission. This review synthesizes the literature on ML methods and their performance for predicting hospital readmission in the US. Methods This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Statement. The extraction of items was also guided by the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). Electronic databases PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were systematically searched from January 1, 2015, through December 10, 2019. The articles were imported into COVIDENCE online software for title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility. Observational studies using ML techniques for hospital readmissions among US patients were eligible for inclusion. Articles without a full text available in the English language were excluded. A qualitative synthesis included study characteristics, ML algorithms utilized, and model validation, and quantitative analysis assessed model performance. Model performances in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC) were analyzed using R software. Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the quality of the reviewed studies. Results Of 522 citations reviewed, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. A majority of the studies used electronic health records (24, 56%), followed by population-based data sources (15, 35%) and administrative claims data (4, 9%). The most common algorithms were tree-based methods (23, 53%), neural network (NN) (14, 33%), regularized logistic regression (12, 28%), and support vector machine (SVM) (10, 23%). Most of these studies (37, 85%) were of high quality. A majority of these studies (28, 65%) reported ML algorithms with an AUC above 0.70. There was a range of variability within AUC reported by these studies with a median of 0.68 (IQR: 0.64-0.76; range: 0.50-0.90). Conclusions The ML algorithms involving tree-based methods, NN, regularized logistic regression, and SVM are commonly used to predict hospital readmission in the US. Further research is needed to compare the performance of ML algorithms for hospital readmission prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]  
Bydon M, 2019, J NEUROSURG-SPINE, P1
[12]   Risk of 30-Day Hospital Readmission Among Patients Discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities: Development and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Model [J].
Chandra, Anupam ;
Rahman, Parvez A. ;
Sneve, Amelia ;
McCoy, Rozalina G. ;
Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg ;
Chaudhry, Rajeev ;
Storlie, Curtis B. ;
Murphree, Dennis H., Jr. ;
Hanson, Gregory J. ;
Takahashi, Paul Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 20 (04) :444-+
[13]   Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations [J].
Chen, Jonathan H. ;
Asch, Steven M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (26) :2507-2509
[14]   A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models [J].
Christodoulou, Evangelia ;
Ma, Jie ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Verbakel, Jan Y. ;
Van Calster, Ben .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 :12-22
[15]  
Cortes C., 1995, KDD-95 Proceedings. First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P57
[16]   Machine learning and microsimulation techniques on the prognosis of dementia: A systematic literature review [J].
Dallora, Ana Luiza ;
Eivazzadeh, Shahryar ;
Mendes, Emilia ;
Berglund, Johan ;
Anderberg, Peter .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06)
[17]   A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Damen, Johanna A. A. G. ;
Snell, Kym I. E. ;
Ensor, Joie ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Riley, Richard D. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[18]   Effect of a Postdischarge Virtual Ward on Readmission or Death for High-Risk Patients A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Dhalla, Irfan A. ;
O'Brien, Tara ;
Morra, Dante ;
Thorpe, Kevin E. ;
Wong, Brian M. ;
Mehta, Rajin ;
Frost, David W. ;
Abrams, Howard ;
Ko, Francoise ;
Van Rooyen, Patrick ;
Bell, Chaim M. ;
Gruneir, Andrea ;
Lewis, Geraint H. ;
Daub, Stacey ;
Anderson, Geoff M. ;
Hawker, Gillian A. ;
Rochon, Paula A. ;
Laupacis, Andreas .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (13) :1305-1312
[19]   Diagnoses and Timing of 30-Day Readmissions After Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia [J].
Dharmarajan, Kumar ;
Hsieh, Angela F. ;
Lin, Zhenqiu ;
Bueno, Hector ;
Ross, Joseph S. ;
Horwitz, Leora I. ;
Barreto-Filho, Jose Augusto ;
Kim, Nancy ;
Bernheim, Susannah M. ;
Suter, Lisa G. ;
Drye, Elizabeth E. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (04) :355-363
[20]   Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers [J].
Doupe, Patrick ;
Faghmous, James ;
Basu, Sanjay .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (07) :808-815