Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Na-Tech risk assessment

被引:49
作者
Lanzano, Giovanni [1 ]
de Magistris, Filippo Santucci [2 ]
Fabbrocino, Giovanni [2 ]
Salzano, Ernesto [3 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Molise, Dipartimento DiBiT, Pesche, IS, Italy
[3] CNR, Ist Ric Combust, I-80124 Naples, Italy
关键词
Pipeline; Earthquake; Na-Tech; Ground failure; Lifeline; Fragility curve; NATURAL HAZARDS; 1999; KOCAELI; EARTHQUAKE; GAS; VULNERABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ACCIDENTS; FACILITIES; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2014.12.006
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The structural integrity of pipelines undergone seismic waves is crucial for industrial installation and for the distributed transportation networks of gaseous and liquid fluids. However, it is nowadays proved that the definition of seismic vulnerability based on purely, structural-derived limit states or on return-to-service or even on the purely economic repair rate indications, is not sufficient for the holistic analysis of risks. On the other hand, detailed numerical studies based on full analyses (including fluid/soil/structure interaction) are too expensive for the aims of risk assessment and simplified methodologies are still needed. In this paper, a large database of earthquake-induced damage for steel and non-steel pipelines is presented. Each case was analyzed and collected from post-earthquake reconnaissance, seismic engineering reports and technical papers. The database may be adopted for the definition of specific vulnerability function (fragility curves), which are commonly implemented in multi-hazard analyses, and more in general for the assessment of Na-Tech risks (Natural events triggering Technological disasters). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Acuna E., 2010, J PIPELINE ENG, V9, P197
[2]  
Akai K., 1995, UCBEERC9501
[3]  
Allen J., 2010, Geotechnical Reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (New Zealand) Earthquake
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1551F USGS US DEP IN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 19984 EN
[6]  
Ariman T, 1984, P 8 WORLD C EARTHQ E, P271
[7]  
Ayala A.G., 1989, 890009 NCEER U NEW Y
[8]  
Ballantyne D., 1991, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V7, P93, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585664
[9]  
Bray J.D., 2001, GEER005
[10]   Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing earthquake-related Na-Tech risk [J].
Busini, Valentina ;
Marzo, Enrico ;
Callioni, Andrea ;
Rota, Renato .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 192 (01) :329-339