A Study on the Optimal Ratio of Research and Development Investment in the Energy Sector: An Empirical Analysis in South Korea

被引:0
作者
Lee, Juyong [1 ]
Cho, Youngsang [1 ]
Shin, Jungwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, Coll Engn, 1732 Deogyeong Daero, Yongin 17104, Gyeonggi, South Korea
关键词
optimal ratio; research and development; energy industry; production function; delta method; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLICY; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM; FACES; INDCS;
D O I
10.3390/en12020288
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The necessity for energy research and development (ER&D) is increasing as greenhouse gases and climate change are becoming global issues. To support sustainable economic growth through ER&D, it is necessary to examine the optimal ratio of ER&D investment to total R&D investment to maximize economic growth. However, there are no studies on the appropriate level of ER&D in total R&D investment for economic growth. This study attempts to empirically estimate the optimal ratio of ER&D investment to maximize gross domestic product (GDP) in South Korea. We utilized the Cobb-Douglas production function for our econometric model and corrected the autocorrelation problem using the Cochrane-Orcutt iterative procedure. Our results showed that both, ER&D and non-ER&D have positive correlations with GDP. The optimal ratio of ER&D is derived as 13.23%, which indicates that the current ratio of Korean ER&D should be revised upward. Further, ER&D investment in the private sector needs to be increased to achieve the optimal ratio because the current statistics in Korea describes that private companies in the energy industry invest much less in R&D than the government. Based on the results, we suggest government strategies to enhance ER&D investment in the private sector as well as the public sector.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Necessary but not sufficient: the role of energy efficiency in industrial sector low-carbon transformation
    Aden, Nate
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (05) : 1083 - 1101
  • [2] Adofu I., 2015, Donnish Journal of Economics and International Finance, V1, P1
  • [3] Renewable energy research progress in Mexico: A review
    Aleman-Nava, Gibran S.
    Casiano-Flores, Victor H.
    Cardenas-Chavez, Diana L.
    Diaz-Chavez, Rocio
    Scarlat, Nicolae
    Mahlknecht, Juergen
    Dallemand, Jean-Francois
    Parra, Roberto
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 32 : 140 - 153
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1984, Zvi Griliches, RD, Patents, and Productivity
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1973, SOCIOL METHOD, DOI [10.2307/270839, DOI 10.2307/270839]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, Main Science and Technology Indicators
  • [7] Concentrating on the Fall of the Labor Share
    Autor, David
    Dorn, David
    Katz, Lawrence F.
    Patterson, Christina
    Van Reenen, John
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) : 180 - 185
  • [8] Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance
    Bianchi, Mattia
    Croce, Annalisa
    Dell'Era, Claudio
    Di Benedetto, C. Anthony
    Frattini, Federico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 33 (04) : 492 - 510
  • [9] From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU
    Bilbao-Osorio, B
    Rodríguez-Pose, A
    [J]. GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (04) : 434 - 455
  • [10] A dynamic general equilibrium model for public R&D investment in Taiwan
    Bor, Yungchang Jeffery
    Chuang, Yih-Chyi
    Lai, Wei-Wen
    Yang, Chung-Min
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2010, 27 (01) : 171 - 183