Systematic Comparison of Objects Classification Methods Based on ALS and Optical Remote Sensing Images in Urban Areas

被引:6
作者
Cai, Hengfan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yanjun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Yunhao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shaochun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Mengjie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Teng, Fei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Hunan Prov Key Lab Geoinformat Engn Surveying Map, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Natl Local Joint Engn Lab Geospatial Informat Tec, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth Sci & Spatial Informat Engn, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
airborne LiDAR point cloud; feature extraction; point cloud classification; machine learning; feature fusion; AIRBORNE LIDAR; EXTRACTION; FUSION; PIXEL; TREE;
D O I
10.3390/electronics11193041
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Geographical object classification and information extraction is an important topic for the construction of 3D virtual reality and digital twin cities in urban areas. However, the majority of current multi-target classification of urban scenes uses only a single source data (optical remote sensing images or airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds), which is limited by the restricted information of the data source itself. In order to make full use of the information carried by multiple data sources, we often need to set more parameters as well as algorithmic steps. To address the above issues, we compared and analyzed the object classification methods based on data fusion of airborne LiDAR point clouds and optical remote sensing images, systematically. Firstly, the features were extracted and determined from airborne LiDAR point clouds and high-resolution optical images. Then, some key feature sets were selected and were composed of median absolute deviation of elevation, normalized elevation values, texture features, normal vectors, etc. The feature sets were fed into various classifiers, such as random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and support vector machines (SVM). Thirdly, the suitable feature sets with appropriate dimensionality were composed, and the point clouds were classified into four categories, such as trees (Tr), houses and buildings (Ho), low-growing vegetation (Gr), and impervious surfaces (Is). Finally, the single data source and multiple data sources, the crucial feature sets and their roles, and the resultant accuracy of different classifier models were compared and analyzed. Under the conditions of different experimental regions, sampling proportion parameters and machine learning models, the results showed that: (1) the overall classification accuracy obtained by the feature-level data fusion method was 76.2% compared with the results of only a single data source, which could improve the overall classification accuracy by more than 2%; (2) the accuracy of the four classes in the urban scenes can reach 88.5% (Is), 76.7% (Gr), 87.2% (Tr), and 88.3% (Ho), respectively, while the overall classification accuracy can reach 87.6% with optimal sampling parameters and random forest classifiers; (3) the RF classifier outperforms DT and SVM for the same sample conditions. In this paper, the method based on ALS point clouds and image data fusion can accurately classify multiple targets in urban scenes, which can provide technical support for 3D scene reconstruction and digital twin cities in complex geospatial environments.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RES FEATURE CLASSIFI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IAPRS International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Semsing and Spatial Information Sciences
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, IAPRS
[4]   Automatic extraction of building roofs using LIDAR data and multispectral imagery [J].
Awrangjeb, Mohammad ;
Zhang, Chunsun ;
Fraser, Clive S. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 83 :1-18
[5]   Automatic 3D Extraction of Buildings, Vegetation and Roads from LIDAR Data [J].
Bellakaout, A. ;
Cherkaoui, M. ;
Ettarid, M. ;
Touzani, A. .
XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION III, 2016, 41 (B3) :173-180
[6]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL BINARY SEARCH TREES USED FOR ASSOCIATIVE SEARCHING [J].
BENTLEY, JL .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1975, 18 (09) :509-517
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Combining UAV-based hyperspectral and LiDAR data for mangrove species classification using the rotation forest algorithm [J].
Cao, Jingjing ;
Liu, Kai ;
Zhuo, Li ;
Liu, Lin ;
Zhu, Yuanhui ;
Peng, Liheng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2021, 102
[9]  
Cheng X., 2016, CHIN J LASERS, V43, P9, DOI [10.3788/CJL201643.0514002, DOI 10.3788/CJL201643.0514002]
[10]  
Cheng Z., 2012, ACTA GEOD CARTOGR SI, V41, P7