A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part II: Analogs Selection and Comparison of Techniques

被引:31
作者
Atencia, Aitor [1 ]
Zawadzki, Isztar [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, JS Marshall Radar Observ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
CONTINENTAL RADAR IMAGES; OROGRAPHIC RAINFALL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; SCALE-DEPENDENCE; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTABILITY; FORECASTS; EXTRAPOLATION; UNCERTAINTY; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-14-00342.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Nowcasting is the short-range forecast obtained from the latest observed state. Currently, heuristic techniques, such as Lagrangian extrapolation, are the most commonly used for rainfall forecasting. However, the Lagrangian extrapolation technique does not account for changes in the motion field or growth and decay of precipitation. These errors are difficult to analytically model and are normally introduced by stochastic processes. According to the chaos theory, similar states, also called analogs, evolve in a similar way plus an error related with the predictability of the situation. Consequently, finding these states in a historical dataset provides a way of forecasting that includes all the physical processes such as growth and decay, among others. The difficulty of this approach lies in finding these analogs. In this study, recent radar observations are compared with a 15-yr radar dataset. Similar states within the dataset are selected according to their spatial rainfall patterns, temporal storm evolution, and synoptic patterns to generate ensembles. This ensemble of analog states is verified against observations for four different events. In addition, it is compared with the previously mentioned Lagrangian stochastic ensemble by means of different scores. This comparison shows the weaknesses and strengths of each technique. This could provide critical information for a future hybrid analog-stochastic nowcasting technique.
引用
收藏
页码:2890 / 2908
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ATENCIA A, 2010, THESIS
[2]  
Atencia A., 2013, 36TH CONF ON RADAR M, V15B, P5
[3]   A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part I: Lagrangian Ensemble Technique [J].
Atencia, Aitor ;
Zawadzki, Isztar .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (11) :4036-4052
[4]  
Bartholmes J, 2005, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V9, P333
[5]   SBMcast - An ensemble nowcasting technique to assess the uncertainty in rainfall forecasts by Lagrangian extrapolation [J].
Berenguer, Marc ;
Sempere-Torres, Daniel ;
Pegram, Geoffrey G. S. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 404 (3-4) :226-240
[6]   Temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology [J].
Berne, A ;
Delrieu, G ;
Creutin, JD ;
Obled, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 299 (3-4) :166-179
[7]   STEPS: A probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP [J].
Bowler, Neill E. ;
Pierce, Clive E. ;
Seed, Alan W. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (620) :2127-2155
[8]  
Diomede T., 2006, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, V3, P3061, DOI DOI 10.5194/HESSD-3-3061-2006
[9]  
Dobryshman Y, 1972, TECH NOTE 120
[10]   Retrieval of analogue radar images for ensemble nowcasting of orographic rainfall [J].
Foresti, Loris ;
Panziera, Luca ;
Mandapaka, Pradeep V. ;
Germann, Urs ;
Seed, Alan .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 22 (02) :141-155