Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors

被引：90

作者：

Gonzalez-Jorge, H. ^{[1
]}

Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P. ^{[2
]}

Martinez-Sanchez, J. ^{[1
]}

Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. ^{[2
]}

Arias, P. ^{[1
]}

Gesto, M. ^{[2
]}

Diaz-Vilarino, L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Vigo, Sch Min Engn, Appl Geotechnol Grp, Vigo 36310, Spain

[2] Univ Salamanca, High Polytech Sch Avila, Cartog & Land Engn Dept, TIDOP Res Grp, Avila 05003, Spain

来源：

MEASUREMENT | 2015年 / 70卷

关键词：

Standard artefact; Optical metrology; 3D sensing device; Gaming sensor; Precision; Accuracy; VERIFICATION; ACCURACY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.042

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

This work shows a metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II laser scanners. The comparison is made using a standard artefact based on 5 spheres and 7 cubes. Accuracy and precision tests are done for different ranges and changing the inclination angle between each sensor and the artefact. Results at 1 m range show similar precision in both cases with values between 2 mm and 6 mm. However, at 2 m range values of Kinect I increase up to 12 mm in some cases, while Kinect II keeps all results below 8 mm. Accuracy is also better for Kinect II at 1 m and 2 m range, with values always lower than -5 mm. Accuracy for Kinect I reaches -12 mm at 1 m range and -25 mm at 2 m range. Precision study shows a decrease of precision with range according a second order polynomial equation for Kinect I, while Kinect II shows a much more stable data. Measurement range of Kinect II is limited to 4 m, while Kinect I can obtain data up to 6 m. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：21 / 26

页数：6

共 18 条

[1] Terrestrial laser scanning used to determine the geometry of a granite boulder for stability analysis purposes
Armesto, J.
Ordonez, C.
Alejano, L.
Arias, P.
[J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2009, 106 (3-4) : 271 - 277
[2] BIPM, 2008, Evaluation of Measurement dataGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement BIPM
[3] Cassola F., 2014, Procedia Technology, V13, P130, DOI [10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.017, DOI 10.1016/J.PROTCY.2014.02.017]
[4] Csaba G., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), P85, DOI 10.1109/SAMI.2012.6208934
[5] Evaluation of the Kinect™ sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace
Dutta, Tilak
[J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2012, 43 (04) : 645 - 649
[6] Automatic segmentation of road overpasses and detection of mortar efflorescence using mobile LiDAR data
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Puente, I.
Riveiro, B.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Arias, P.
[J]. OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 54 : 353 - 361
[7] Metrological evaluation of Microsoft Kinect and Asus Xtion sensors
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Riveiro, B.
Vazquez-Fernandez, E.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Arias, P.
[J]. MEASUREMENT, 2013, 46 (06) : 1800 - 1806
[8] Standard artifact for the geometric verification of terrestrial laser scanning systems
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Riveiro, B.
Armesto, J.
Arias, P.
[J]. OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 43 (07) : 1249 - 1256
[9] Application of Kinect Gaming Sensor in Forensic Science
Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio
Zancajo, Sandra
Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego
Arias, Pedro
[J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (01) : 206 - 211
[10] Verification artifact for photogrammetric measurement systems
Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio
Riveiro, Belen
Armesto, Julia
Arias, Pedro
[J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 50 (07)

← 1 2 →