Maximum tumor diameter is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in prostate cancer

被引:79
作者
Eichelberger, LE
Koch, MO
Eble, JN
Ulbright, TM
Juliar, BE
Cheng, L
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Div Biostat, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
prostate; neoplasm; prostatectomy; tumor length; tumor diameter; tumor volume; PSA recurrence; TNM staging;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.3800405
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Maximum tumor diameter has been shown to correlate with multiple predictors of clinical outcome in prostate cancer. In the current study, we prospectively analyze whether maximum tumor diameter is a significant predictor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence. The study population consisted of 364 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Prostatectomy specimens were evaluated by whole-mount processing of the entire prostate. Maximum tumor diameter was measured from the whole-mount sections of the prostate. Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation was used to correlate tumor diameter with continuous variables. T-tests or analysis of variance ( ANOVA) tests were performed to determine if tumor diameter was significantly associated with other clinical and pathologic variables. The effect of clinical and pathologic variables on time to recurrence was analyzed using Cox regression. The mean tumor diameter for all patients was 1.73 cm ( range, 0.02 - 4.40 cm). Maximum tumor diameter was associated with preoperative PSA ( r = 0.22, P<0.0001), prostate weight ( r = - 0.12, P = 0.028), tumor volume ( r = 0.87, P<0.0001), Gleason score ( r = 0.29, P<0.0001), and pathologic stage ( P<0.0001). Cox multiple regression was performed to test the prognostic value of maximum tumor diameter adjusting for pathologic stage, Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Increased maximum tumor diameter was associated with shorter time to PSA recurrence ( hazard ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.13 - 2.56, P = 0.01), controlling for risk factors, Gleason score, and surgical margin status. We conclude that maximum tumor diameter is a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 890
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Heterogeneity of gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinorna of the prostate [J].
Arora, R ;
Koch, MO ;
Eble, JN ;
Ulbright, TM ;
Li, L ;
Cheng, L .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (11) :2362-2366
[2]  
Babaian RJ, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1414
[3]  
BOSTWICK DG, 1997, UROLOGIC SURG PATHOL, P343
[4]   Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: Intermediate-term results [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) :2428-2434
[5]   Evidence of independent origin of multiple tumors from patients with prostate cancer [J].
Cheng, L ;
Song, SY ;
Pretlow, TG ;
Abdul-Karim, FW ;
Kung, HJ ;
Dawson, DV ;
Park, WS ;
Moon, YW ;
Tsai, ML ;
Linehan, WM ;
Emmert-Buck, MR ;
Liotta, LA ;
Zhuang, ZP .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (03) :233-237
[6]   Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy [J].
Cheng, L ;
Slezak, J ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Myers, RP ;
Zincke, H ;
Bostwick, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (15) :2862-2868
[7]   Does pT2b prostate carcinoma exist? Critical appraisal of the 2002 TNM classification of prostate carcinoma [J].
Eichelberger, LE ;
Cheng, L .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (12) :2573-2576
[8]   Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer [J].
Eichelberger, LE ;
Koch, MO ;
Daggy, JK ;
Ulbright, TM ;
Eble, JN ;
Cheng, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 120 (03) :386-391
[9]  
FLEMING ID, 1997, AM JOINT COMMITTEE C, P2219
[10]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64