Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions

被引:9
|
作者
Ide, Daisuke [1 ,2 ]
Ohya, Tomohiko Richard [3 ]
Ishioka, Mitsuaki [1 ]
Enomoto, Yuri [1 ]
Nakao, Eisuke [1 ]
Mitsuyoshi, Yuki [1 ,2 ]
Tokura, Junki [1 ]
Suzuki, Keigo [1 ]
Yakabi, Seiichi [1 ]
Yasue, Chihiro [1 ]
Chino, Akiko [1 ]
Igarashi, Masahiro [1 ]
Nakashima, Akio [4 ]
Saruta, Masayuki [2 ]
Saito, Shoichi [1 ]
Fujisaki, Junko [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Hosp Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Dept Gastroenterol, 3-8-31,Ariake, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Jikei Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Jikei Univ, Dept Endoscopy, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Jikei Univ, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Colorectum; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Pocket-creation method; Residual or recurrent lesion; Traction device; EN-BLOC RESECTION; MUCOSAL RESECTION; TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES; TUMORS; NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.5946/ce.2022.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (ID) with that of conventional BD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions. Methods: We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events. Results: En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm(2)/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group. Conclusions: PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 664
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [22] The pocket-creation method may facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal sessile tumors
    Yamashina, Takeshi
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Fukuda, Hisashi
    Okada, Masahiro
    Takezawa, Takahito
    Kobayashi, Yasutoshi
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    Sunada, Keijiro
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 08 (08) : E1021 - E1030
  • [23] Prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Yamashina, Takeshi
    Nemoto, Daiki
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Fukuda, Hisashi
    Okada, Masahiro
    Takezawa, Takahito
    Aizawa, Masato
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Sunada, Keijiro
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Togashi, Kazutomo
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (02) : 368 - 379
  • [24] Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a pocket-creation method: a modified technique of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection Reply
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (04) : 401 - 401
  • [25] The "pocket-creation method" facilitates ESD of recurrent colorectal lesions
    Murayama, Kozue
    Sunada, Keijiro
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Fukuda, Hisashi
    Okada, Masahiro
    Takahashi, Haruo
    Nagayama, Manabu
    Takezawa, Takahito
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Yuji, Ino
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Yano, Tomonori
    Sato, Hiroyuki
    Osawa, Hiroyuki
    Lefor, Alan K.
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 178 - 178
  • [26] Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using the Pocket-Creation Method Is Useful for the Treatment of Colorectal Tumors Associated With Severe Submucosal Fibrosis
    Sasaki, Fumisato
    Nasu, Yuichirou
    Maeda, Hidehito
    Maeda, Takuro
    Arima, Shiho
    Tanoue, Shiroh
    Hashimoto, Shinichi
    Kanmura, Shuji
    Ido, Akio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB400 - AB400
  • [27] Pocket-creation method for the safe, reliable, and efficient endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal lateral spreading tumors
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 27 (04) : 534 - 535
  • [28] The pocket-creation method makes endoscopic submucosal dissection feasible for duodenum neoplasms
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Ino, Yuji
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Sasao, Wataru
    Takashita, Haruo
    Nagayama, Manabu
    Takezawa, Takahito
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Shinhata, Hakuei
    Sato, Hiroyuki
    Yano, Tomonori
    Sunada, Keijiro
    Osawa, Hiroyuki
    Lefor, Alan T.
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 296 - 296
  • [29] The pocket-creation method for endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with saline-immersion: another potential option to overcome challenges in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Despott, Edward J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 90 (02) : 288 - 289
  • [30] Switching from the pocket-creation method to double clip and rubber-band traction in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Shiratori, Yasutoshi
    Yoshimoto, Takaaki
    Ikeya, Takashi
    ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (05) : E166 - E168