Supplier development for sustainability: contextual barriers in global supply chains

被引:159
作者
Busse, Christian [1 ]
Schleper, Martin C. [2 ]
Niu, Menglei [3 ]
Wagner, Stephan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Zurich, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] German Grad Sch Management & Law GGS, Dept Supply Chain Management & Logist, Heilbronn, Germany
[3] LeasePlan Supply Serv AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
关键词
Supplier development; Sustainable supply chain management; Global supply chain; Barrier; Conceptions of sustainability; Dyadic case study; Goal-setting theory; BUYING FIRMS; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; CAPABILITIES; ANTECEDENTS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2015-0300
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore contextual barriers to supplier development for sustainability (SDS) in global supply chains and managerial remedies to mitigate such barriers. Design/methodology/approach - A dyadic case study design was adopted with a Western European buyer and six of its Chinese suppliers. The database consists of 41 interviews and 81 documents. Findings - Contextual barriers to SDS in global supply chains derive from complexities in the sustainability concept, socio-economic differences, spatial and linguistic distance, as well as cultural differences between buyers and suppliers. Partial remedies include effective joint communications, an open organizational culture, and the fostering of cross-contextual understanding. Research limitations/implications - The findings contribute to theory development at the intersection of sustainable and global supply chain management research. They help to explain why scarce sustainability-related progress in global supply chains has occurred in recent years. Practical implications - The identified barriers facilitate managerial decision making that will expedite SDS progress in global contexts. Social implications - By diffusing knowledge regarding available remedies, the study contributes to improving SDS effectiveness, thereby fostering sustainability capabilities and performance of suppliers. Originality/value - This research highlights the criticality of contextual barriers to SDS. The barrier effects that stem from differing real-world conceptions of sustainability may inform future sustainable supply chain management research within and beyond SDS.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 468
页数:27
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Toward a model for international business ethics [J].
Asgary, N ;
Mitschow, MC .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2002, 36 (03) :239-246
[2]   Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (12) :1200-1210
[3]   Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework [J].
Bhagat, RS ;
Kedia, BL ;
Harveston, PD ;
Triandis, HC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (02) :204-221
[4]   Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance [J].
Blome, Constantin ;
Hollos, Daniel ;
Paulraj, Antony .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (01) :32-49
[5]  
Busse C., 2014, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V44, P714
[6]  
Busse C., 2014, INT J PHYS DISTRIBUT
[7]   Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management [J].
Busse, Christian .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (02) :28-47
[8]   Decision Theory as Practice: Crafting Rationality in Organizations [J].
Cabantous, Laure ;
Gond, Jean-Pascal ;
Johnson-Cramer, Michael .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2010, 31 (11) :1531-1566
[9]   Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust [J].
Cai, Shaohan ;
Jun, Minjoon ;
Yang, Zhilin .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (03) :257-268
[10]   A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory [J].
Carter, Craig R. ;
Rogers, Dale S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (5-6) :360-387