Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table

被引:241
|
作者
Lewin, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Bohren, Meghan
Rashidian, Arash [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Munthe-Kaas, Heather [1 ]
Glenton, Claire [1 ]
Colvin, Christopher J. [6 ]
Garside, Ruth [7 ]
Noyes, Jane [8 ]
Booth, Andrew [9 ]
Tuncalp, Ozge [3 ]
Wainwright, Megan [6 ]
Flottorp, Signe [1 ]
Tucker, Joseph D. [10 ]
Carlsen, Benedicte [11 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[2] South African Med Res Council, Hlth Syst Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Special Programme Res Dev & Res Training Human Re, UNDP,UNFPA,UNICEF,World Bank, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Tehran, Iran
[5] WHO, Eastern Mediterranean Reg Off, Informat Evidence & Res Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[6] Univ Cape Town, Sch Publ Hlth & Family Med, Div Social & Behav Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[7] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Exeter, Devon, England
[8] Bangor Univ, Sch Social Sci, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[9] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[10] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[11] Uni Res Rokkan Ctr, Bergen, Norway
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2018年 / 13卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Qualitative research; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Systematic review methodology; Research design; Methodology; Confidence; Guidance; Evidence-based practice; GRADE; FACILITATORS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on making an overall assessment of confidence in a review finding and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and a CERQual Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Methods: We developed this guidance by examining the methods used by other GRADE approaches, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We then piloted the guidance on several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the approach. Results: Confidence in the evidence is an assessment of the extent to which a review finding is a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. Creating a summary of each review finding and deciding whether or not CERQual should be used are important steps prior to assessing confidence. Confidence should be assessed for each review finding individually, based on the judgements made for each of the four CERQual components. Four levels are used to describe the overall assessment of confidence: high, moderate, low or very low. The overall CERQual assessment for each review finding should be explained in a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Conclusions: Structuring and summarising review findings, assessing confidence in those findings using CERQual and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table should be essential components of undertaking qualitative evidence syntheses. This paper describes the end point of a CERQual assessment and should be read in conjunction with the other papers in the series that provide information on assessing individual CERQual components.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条