The Effects of Relationship Education in Low-Income Couples: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Evaluation Studies

被引:56
作者
Arnold, Louisa S. [1 ]
Beelmann, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Jena, Germany
关键词
couple/marital/romantic relationships; family policy; low-income; meta-analysis; parenthood; prevention; program evaluation; relationship education; PREMARITAL EDUCATION; PARENTING PROGRAM; MARITAL QUALITY; MARRIAGE; PREVENTION; FAMILIES; BEHAVIOR; FATHERS; POLICY; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/fare.12325
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of relationship education programs in low-income couples. Background Relationship education programs have been developed in response to family structure changes over the past few decades that have placed low-income couples, in particular, at risk. These programs are designed to teach effective communication and problem-solving skills, which are important resources for the prevention of divorce, single parenthood, and absent fathers, and to navigate complex stepfamily constellations. Method A systematic literature search for studies evaluating relationship education within a randomized-controlled design in low-income couples was conducted, resulting in a set of 16 eligible research reports (providing information about 48 independent studies). Weighted mean effects were calculated, and moderators of effectiveness were examined in meta-analyses of variance and metaregressions. Results Analyses revealed a small but statistically significant mean effect of d(+) = 0.10 (SE = 0.03), which doubled when program attendance rates exceeded 50%. Effects were generally higher in less disadvantaged samples (i.e., those that were older, more educated, higher-income, and more likely to be married). Conclusion Relationship education can have small and stable effects, especially when retention rates are high. Offering programs at the transition to parenthood is a promising strategy. Implications: More needs to be done to reach out to the most vulnerable couples and improve participation and retention rates. The present strategies are not sufficiently effective in recruiting and retaining the target population. Combining relationship education with other programs and services might be more feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 38
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
[21]   Developing the couple perspective in parenting support: evaluation of a service initiative for vulnerable families [J].
Clulow, Christopher ;
Donaghy, Miriam .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2010, 32 (02) :142-168
[22]   Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development [J].
Conger, Rand D. ;
Conger, Katherine J. ;
Martin, Monica J. .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2010, 72 (03) :685-704
[23]   Controversies in Couple Relationship Education (CRE): Overlooked Evidence and Implications for Research and Policy [J].
Cowan, Philip A. ;
Cowan, Carolyn Pape .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2014, 20 (04) :361-383
[24]   Marriage and Fatherhood Programs [J].
Cowan, Philip A. ;
Cowan, Carolyn Pape ;
Knox, Virginia .
FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2010, 20 (02) :205-230
[25]  
Dion M.R., 2003, HELPING UNWED PARENT
[26]   Relationship Satisfaction Trajectories Across the Transition to Parenthood Among Low-Risk Parents [J].
Don, Brian P. ;
Mickelson, Kristin D. .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2014, 76 (03) :677-692
[27]   Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation [J].
Durlak, Joseph A. ;
DuPre, Emily P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 41 (3-4) :327-350
[28]  
Edin K, 2011, PROMISES I CAN KEEP: WHY POOR WOMEN PUT MOTHERHOOD BEFORE MARRIAGE, P1
[29]   What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? [J].
Edin, K .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2000, 47 (01) :112-133
[30]  
Elder G. H., 1999, Children of the Great Depression: Social change in life experience