Modeling Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey

被引:58
作者
Khavas, Zahra Rezaei [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, S. Reza [2 ]
Robinette, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Elect & Comp Engn, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Comp Sci, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
来源
SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2020 | 2020年 / 12483卷
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Human-robot trust; Modeling trust in HRI; Trust calibration in HRI; Trust measurement; AUTOMATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_44
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As the autonomy and capabilities of robotic systems increase, they are expected to play the role of teammates rather than tools and interact with human collaborators in a more realistic manner, creating a more human-like relationship. Given the impact of trust observed in human-robot interaction (HRI), appropriate trust in robotic collaborators is one of the leading factors influencing the performance of human-robot interaction. Team performance can be diminished if people do not trust robots appropriately by disusing or misusing them based on limited experience. Therefore, trust in HRI needs to be calibrated properly, rather than maximized, to let the formation of an appropriate level of trust in human collaborators. For trust calibration in HRI, trust needs to be modeled first. There are many reviews on factors affecting trust in HRI [22] , however, as there are no reviews concentrated on different trust models, in this paper, we review different techniques and methods for trust modeling in HRI. We also present a list of potential directions for further research and some challenges that need to be addressed in future work on human-robot trust modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 541
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ROBUST INTELLIGENCE
[2]  
Atoyan H., 2006, P 18 C LINTERACTION, P115, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1132736.1132751, 10.1145/1132736.1132751]
[3]   The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents [J].
Bainbridge, Wilma A. ;
Hart, Justin W. ;
Kim, Elizabeth S. ;
Scassellati, Brian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2011, 3 (01) :41-52
[4]  
Barber B., 1983, LOGIC LIMITS TRUST, P9
[5]   Predictive model to assess user trust: A psycho-physiological approach [J].
Ben, Ighoyota ;
Sousa, Sonia C. ;
Kosunen, Ilkka Johannes ;
Lamas, David .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIAN CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (INDIA HCI 2019), 2019, :32-41
[6]  
Boyce M.W., 2015, P 10 ANN ACMIEEE INT, P179
[7]  
Cameron D., 2015, Framing Factors: The Importance of Context and the Individual in Understanding Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
[8]   Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief [J].
Chang, Luke J. ;
Doll, Bradley B. ;
van 't Wout, Mascha ;
Frank, Michael J. ;
Sanfey, Alan G. .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 61 (02) :87-105
[9]   Planning with Trust for Human-Robot Collaboration [J].
Chen, Min ;
Nikolaidis, Stefanos ;
Soh, Harold ;
Hsu, David ;
Srinivasa, Siddhartha .
HRI '18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2018, :307-315
[10]  
Cohen M.S., 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, P1