Limited sampling strategy for cyclosporine (Neoral®) area under the curve monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

被引:8
作者
Strong, DK
Lai, A
Primmett, D
White, CT
Lirenman, DS
Carter, JE
Hurley, RM
Virji, M
Ensom, MHH
机构
[1] Childrens & Womens Hlth Ctr British Columbia, Dept Pharm, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
[2] British Columbia Transplant Soc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Childrens & Womens Hlth Ctr British Columbia, Div Nephrol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
cyclosporine; pediatric; renal transplantation; pharmacokinetics; limited sampling strategy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00339.x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Cyclosporine (CSA; Neoral((R))) is one of the most common immunosuppressants used in pediatric renal transplantation. Research in adult renal transplant recipients has shown that 2-h post-dose concentration (C-2) monitoring and limited sampling strategies (LSSs) are better at predicting drug exposure and outcome than trough concentrations (C-0). While C-0 monitoring is the usual practice in pediatric renal transplant patients, area under the curve (AUC) monitoring has been shown to be superior in terms of predictive ability and outcomes. However, AUC monitoring is impractical and inconvenient in a clinic setting because it involves many blood samples. An LSS provides a reliable alternative. The purpose of this study was to prospectively define an LSS (AUC(0-12)) for CSA monitoring and to test its predictive performance. As well, an LSS (AUC(0-4)) for CSA was developed and its predictive performance tested. Blood samples for CSA concentrations were collected in 29 stable pediatric renal transplant patients prior to (t = 0) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h following a steady-state morning CSA dose. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal method; LSSs for AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4) were determined using multiple regression analysis in 14 patients; and the LSSs' predictive performance was tested in 15 additional patients. Both LSSs require two blood samples. For the LSS (AUC(0-12)), blood samples are required immediately before the dose and 2 h post-dose: AUC(0-12) = 12.45 C-0 + 2.17 C-2 + 723.16 (r(2) = 0.909). For the LSS (AUC(0-4)), blood samples are required at one and 2 h post-dose, AUC(0-4) = 1.17 C-1 + 1.85 C-2 - 41.00 (r(2) = 0.971). The LSSs demonstrated low bias and high precision for both AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4). Our two-concentration LSSs are accurate and precise predictors that are more clinically useful for our patient population than other LSSs that have been developed for pediatric renal transplant patients. Our study template provides a guide for other centers to develop accurate and precise LSSs specific to their own patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 573
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
*ABB LAB, 1998, IMM DRUG ASS CYCL MO
[2]  
Amante AJ, 1996, CLIN CHEM, V42, P1294
[3]   Neoral absorption profiling: An evolution in effectiveness [J].
Belitsky, P ;
Levy, GA ;
Johnston, A .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (3A) :45S-52S
[4]  
Chateauvert N, 1998, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V18, P364
[5]   Cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in paediatric transplant recipients [J].
Cooney, GF ;
Habucky, K ;
Hoppu, K .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 32 (06) :481-495
[6]   A strategy to calculate cyclosporin A area under the time-concentration curve in pediatric renal transplantation [J].
David-Neto, E ;
Araujo, LP ;
Alves, CF ;
Sumita, N ;
Romano, P ;
Yagyu, EM ;
Nahas, WC ;
Ianhez, LE .
PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 6 (04) :313-318
[7]  
David-Neto E, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P343, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V112343
[8]   Sampling strategy to calculate the cyclosporin-A area under the time-concentration curve [J].
David-Neto, E ;
Araujo, LMP ;
Brito, ZML ;
Alves, CF ;
Lemos, FC ;
Yagyu, EM ;
Nahas, WC ;
Ianhez, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (06) :546-550
[9]  
de Gatta MDF, 2002, CLIN PHARMACOKINET, V41, P115
[10]   C2 monitoring: A reliable tool in pediatric renal transplant recipients [J].
Dello Strologo, L ;
Pontesilli, C ;
Rizzoni, G ;
Tozzi, AE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (02) :444-445