Propagation of dynamic measurement uncertainty

被引:16
作者
Hessling, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] SP Tech Res Inst Sweden, SE-50115 Boras, Sweden
关键词
dynamic; measurement; model; uncertainty; covariance; signals; measurement system;
D O I
10.1088/0957-0233/22/10/105105
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The time-dependent measurement uncertainty has been evaluated in a number of recent publications, starting from a known uncertain dynamic model. This could be defined as the 'downward' propagation of uncertainty from the model to the targeted measurement. The propagation of uncertainty 'upward' from the calibration experiment to a dynamic model traditionally belongs to system identification. The use of different representations (time, frequency, etc) is ubiquitous in dynamic measurement analyses. An expression of uncertainty in dynamic measurements is formulated for the first time in this paper independent of representation, joining upward as well as downward propagation. For applications in metrology, the high quality of the characterization may be prohibitive for any reasonably large and robust model to pass the whiteness test. This test is therefore relaxed by not directly requiring small systematic model errors in comparison to the randomness of the characterization. Instead, the systematic error of the dynamic model is propagated to the uncertainty of the measurand, analogously but differently to how stochastic contributions are propagated. The pass criterion of the model is thereby transferred from the identification to acceptance of the total accumulated uncertainty of the measurand. This increases the relevance of the test of the model as it relates to its final use rather than the quality of the calibration. The propagation of uncertainty hence includes the propagation of systematic model errors. For illustration, the 'upward' propagation of uncertainty is applied to determine if an appliance box is damaged in an earthquake experiment. In this case, relaxation of the whiteness test was required to reach a conclusive result.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Measurement uncertainty in manometers used in spygmomanometers [J].
Silva, Junior S. H. ;
Monteiro, Costa E. .
IV LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2007, BIOENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR LATIN AMERICA HEALTH, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 18 (1,2) :890-894
[42]   Measurement uncertainty of microbiological viable counts [J].
Seppo Ilmari Niemelä .
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2003, 8 :559-563
[43]   Rigorous Uncertainty Propagation Using a Dosimetry Transfer Calibration [J].
Griffin, Patrick J. ;
Vehar, David W. ;
Parma, Edward J. ;
Hahn, Kelly D. .
REACTOR DOSIMETRY: 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMOSIUM, 2018, 1608 :124-134
[44]   On the use of the ‘uncertainty budget’ to detect dominant terms in the evaluation of measurement uncertainty [J].
Manuel Solaguren-Beascoa Fernández .
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2011, 16 :83-88
[45]   On the use of the 'uncertainty budget' to detect dominant terms in the evaluation of measurement uncertainty [J].
Solaguren-Beascoa Fernandez, Manuel .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2011, 16 (02) :83-88
[46]   Measurement uncertainty [J].
Bartley, David ;
Liden, Goran .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2008, 52 (06) :413-417
[47]   Uncertainty Measurement for a Set-Valued Information System: Gaussian Kernel Method [J].
He, Jiali ;
Wang, Pei ;
Li, Zhaowen .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (02)
[48]   GUM-Based Decisional Criteria to Make Decisions in Presence of Measurement Uncertainty [J].
Morello, Rosario .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2020, 69 (08) :5511-5522
[49]   Dynamic metrology - an approach to dynamic evaluation of linear time-invariant measurement systems [J].
Hessling, J. P. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 19 (08)
[50]   The dynamic measurement uncertainty evaluation on coal mine pump performance testing systems [J].
Wang, G. M. ;
Xie, X. F. ;
Jiao, S. L. ;
Zhang, L. ;
Niu, Q. N. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2012, 9 (02) :151-154