Propagation of dynamic measurement uncertainty

被引:16
作者
Hessling, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] SP Tech Res Inst Sweden, SE-50115 Boras, Sweden
关键词
dynamic; measurement; model; uncertainty; covariance; signals; measurement system;
D O I
10.1088/0957-0233/22/10/105105
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The time-dependent measurement uncertainty has been evaluated in a number of recent publications, starting from a known uncertain dynamic model. This could be defined as the 'downward' propagation of uncertainty from the model to the targeted measurement. The propagation of uncertainty 'upward' from the calibration experiment to a dynamic model traditionally belongs to system identification. The use of different representations (time, frequency, etc) is ubiquitous in dynamic measurement analyses. An expression of uncertainty in dynamic measurements is formulated for the first time in this paper independent of representation, joining upward as well as downward propagation. For applications in metrology, the high quality of the characterization may be prohibitive for any reasonably large and robust model to pass the whiteness test. This test is therefore relaxed by not directly requiring small systematic model errors in comparison to the randomness of the characterization. Instead, the systematic error of the dynamic model is propagated to the uncertainty of the measurand, analogously but differently to how stochastic contributions are propagated. The pass criterion of the model is thereby transferred from the identification to acceptance of the total accumulated uncertainty of the measurand. This increases the relevance of the test of the model as it relates to its final use rather than the quality of the calibration. The propagation of uncertainty hence includes the propagation of systematic model errors. For illustration, the 'upward' propagation of uncertainty is applied to determine if an appliance box is damaged in an earthquake experiment. In this case, relaxation of the whiteness test was required to reach a conclusive result.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Effects of chaotic dynamic-system behavior on measurement uncertainty [J].
Machekhin, Yu. P. .
MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2008, 51 (01) :6-10
[22]   A self-adaptive method for the assessment of dynamic measurement uncertainty [J].
Wang, Jun ;
Deng, Huaxia ;
Wu, Yimin ;
Ma, Mengchao ;
Zhong, Xiang .
MEASUREMENT, 2022, 196
[23]   Uncertainty Propagation and Assessment of Five-Axis On-Machine Measurement Error [J].
Zhuang, Qixin ;
Wan, Neng ;
Guo, Yanheng ;
Chang, Zhiyong ;
Wang, Zhan .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (10)
[24]   Propagation of uncertainty in ecological models of reservoirs: From physical to population dynamic predictions [J].
Rigosi, Anna ;
Rueda, Francisco J. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 247 :199-209
[25]   Error and Uncertainty in Metallographic Measurement [J].
Keeble, Michael E. .
100 YEARS OF E04 DEVELOPMENT OF METALLOGRAPHY STANDARDS, 2019, 1607 :53-65
[26]   Uncertainty propagation in activation cross section measurements [J].
Otuka, N. ;
Lalremruata, B. ;
Khandaker, M. U. ;
Usman, A. R. ;
Punte, L. R. M. .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 :502-510
[27]   DYNAMIC PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH UNCERTAINTY [J].
Yu, Mei ;
Inoue, Hiroshi ;
Takahashi, Satoru ;
Shi, Jianming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (02) :237-250
[28]   Gas Sensor Array Dynamic Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation and Optimization Algorithm [J].
Zhang, Wenwen ;
Wang, Lei ;
Ye, Lihua ;
Li, Peilong ;
Hu, Mingxue .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :35779-35794
[29]   Precise measurement of the size of nanoparticles by dynamic light scattering with uncertainty analysis [J].
Takahashi, Kayori ;
Kato, Haruhisa ;
Saito, Takeshi ;
Matsuyama, Shigetomo ;
Kinugasa, Shinichi .
PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 2008, 25 (01) :31-38
[30]   UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION OF PIEZOELECTRIC CONSTANT MEASUREMENT BASED ON DYNAMIC RESONANCE METHOD [J].
Zhang, Rui-wen ;
He, Long-biao ;
Zhu, Hai-jiang ;
Yang, Ping .
2013 SYMPOSIUM ON PIEZOELECTRICITY, ACOUSTIC WAVES AND DEVICE APPLICATIONS (SPAWDA), 2013, :253-257