A method for the identification of COVID-19 biomarkers in human breath using Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

被引:28
|
作者
Liangou, Aikaterini [1 ]
Tasoglou, Antonios [1 ]
Huber, Heinz J. [2 ]
Wistrom, Christopher [3 ]
Brody, Kevin [4 ]
Menon, Prahlad G. [5 ,6 ]
Bebekoski, Thomas [4 ]
Menschel, Kevin [4 ]
Davidson-Fiedler, Marlise [4 ]
DeMarco, Karl [3 ]
Salphale, Harshad [1 ]
Wistrom, Jonathan [7 ]
Wistrom, Skyler [7 ]
Lee, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] RJ Lee Grp Inc, Monroeville, PA USA
[2] Edelweiss Technol Solut LLC, Novelty, OH USA
[3] Mercyhealth, Janesville, WI USA
[4] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI USA
[5] QuantMD, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Pract Sustainbil LLC, Maryville, MO USA
关键词
VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101207
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: COVID-19 has caused a worldwide pandemic, making the early detection of the virus crucial. We present an approach for the determination of COVID-19 infection based on breath analysis. Methods: A high sensitivity mass spectrometer was combined with artificial intelligence and used to develop a method for the identification of COVID-19 in human breath within seconds. A set of 1137 positive and negative subjects from different age groups, collected in two periods from two hospitals in the USA, from 26 August, 2020 until 15 September, 2020 and from 11 September, 2020 until 11 November, 2020, was used for the method development. The subjects exhaled in a Tedlar bag, and the exhaled breath samples were subsequently analyzed using a Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS). The produced mass spectra were introduced to a series of machine learning models. 70% of the data was used for these sub-models' training and 30% was used for testing. Findings: A set of 340 samples, 95 positives and 245 negatives, was used for the testing. The combined models successfully predicted 77 out of the 95 samples as positives and 199 out of the 245 samples as negatives. The overall accuracy of the model was 81.2%. Since over 50% of the total positive samples belonged to the age group of over 55 years old, the performance of the model in this category was also separately evaluated on 339 subjects (170 negative and 169 positive). The model correctly identified 166 out of the 170 negatives and 164 out of the 169 positives. The model accuracy in this case was 97.3%. Interpretation: The results showed that this method for the identification of COVID-19 infection is a promising tool, which can give fast and accurate results. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] High-Throughput Breath Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Using Thermal Desorption Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
    Romano, Andrea
    Doran, Sophie
    Belluomo, Ilaria
    Hanna, George Bushra
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 90 (17) : 10204 - 10210
  • [12] A feasibility study of Covid-19 detection using breath analysis by high-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Zhang, Peize
    Ren, Tantan
    Chen, Haibin
    Li, Qingyun
    He, Mengqi
    Feng, Yong
    Wang, Lei
    Huang, Ting
    Yuan, Jing
    Deng, Guofang
    Lu, Hongzhou
    JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (04)
  • [13] On Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations Using Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
    Cappellin, Luca
    Karl, Thomas
    Probst, Michael
    Ismailova, Oksana
    Winkler, Paul M.
    Soukoulis, Christos
    Aprea, Eugenio
    Maerk, Tilmann D.
    Gasperi, Flavia
    Biasioli, Franco
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (04) : 2283 - 2290
  • [14] Multi-capillary-column proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Ruzsanyi, Veronika
    Fischer, Lukas
    Herbig, Jens
    Ager, Clemes
    Amann, Anton
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1316 : 112 - 118
  • [15] A new method for real-time monitoring of volatiles in frying fumes using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry with time-of-flight analyser
    Tomasz Majchrzak
    Wojciech Wojnowski
    Tomasz Dymerski
    Jacek Gębicki
    Jacek Namieśnik
    Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, 2018, 149 : 1549 - 1554
  • [16] A new method for real-time monitoring of volatiles in frying fumes using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry with time-of-flight analyser
    Majchrzak, Tomasz
    Wojnowski, Wojciech
    Dymerski, Tomasz
    Gebicki, Jacek
    Namiesnik, Jacek
    MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE, 2018, 149 (09): : 1549 - 1554
  • [17] Field measurements of methylglyoxal using proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry and comparison to the DNPH-HPLC-UV method
    Michoud, Vincent
    Sauvage, Stephane
    Leonardis, Thierry
    Fronval, Isabelle
    Kukui, Alexandre
    Locoge, Nadine
    Dusanter, Sebastien
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (10) : 5729 - 5740
  • [18] Characterization of Gas-Phase Organics Using Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry: Cooking Emissions
    Klein, Felix
    Platt, Stephen M.
    Farren, Naomi J.
    Detournay, Anais
    Bruns, Emily A.
    Bozzetti, Carlo
    Daellenbach, Kaspar R.
    Kilic, Dogushan
    Kumar, Nivedita K.
    Pieber, Simone M.
    Slowik, Jay G.
    Temime-Roussel, Brice
    Marchand, Nicolas
    Hamilton, Jacqueline F.
    Baltensperger, Urs
    Prevot, Andre S. H.
    El Haddad, Imad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (03) : 1243 - 1250
  • [19] Elucidation of artefacts in proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometers
    Salazar Gomez, Jorge Ivan
    Klucken, Christian
    Sojka, Martha
    Masliuk, Liudmyla
    Lunkenbein, Thomas
    Schloegl, Robert
    Ruland, Holger
    JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2019, 54 (12): : 987 - 1002
  • [20] Differentiation of isomeric compounds by two-stage proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Inomata, Satoshi
    Tanimoto, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2008, 19 (03) : 325 - 331